Si la demanda de nanotubos crece 10x más rápido que la infraestructura de hidrógeno, ¿qué hacen con el excedente de H2?

If directing attention toward the immeasurable assigns it value through instruction, how does this prescription escape the same quantification logic it claims to transcend?

Doesn't requiring humans to be mute for parity mean you measured communication dependency rather than collective intelligence?

Does the embodied carbon in manufacturing hardware for 50 billion annual tokens exceed operational emissions from sharing amortized datacenter GPUs across thousands of users?

It's important to note that Kuhn was writing at the very pinnacle of Big Science so he is not seperate from it and his work might be considered propaganda of that age, a marvelous age to be a dogmatist but very challenging to wrangle with now that it's breaking down

They just do their lab work, the constant experimentation and observation on a guided path that is given to them by the scientific community, who are dogmatic (Kuhn thinks the dogma is a necessary part of science; Feyerabend DOES NOT and I'm excited to read him next)

Scientists don't need history to do their normal science, the stuff in between the revolutions of science that causes them to seek out history and philosophy to help them understand why no one agrees on the reality of the situation

The reason we have the codex is because charlemagne felt shame over not being able to read (this is a guess)