@steviegpro.bsky.social
It’s def 12/19
December 20, 2025 at 5:13 PM
It’s def 12/19
That would be plausible if the Jake Holmes record was anywhere to be found on the Hot 100, which it wasn’t. It had peaked at number 49 a month earlier and it was steadily falling off after that. 12/19 was actually the first week that it wasn’t on the hot 100 at all.
December 20, 2025 at 5:12 PM
That would be plausible if the Jake Holmes record was anywhere to be found on the Hot 100, which it wasn’t. It had peaked at number 49 a month earlier and it was steadily falling off after that. 12/19 was actually the first week that it wasn’t on the hot 100 at all.
Agreed that it is, but still weird that Casey pretended a song was #39 that had already fallen out of the hot 100 in which only Peaked at number 49
December 20, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Agreed that it is, but still weird that Casey pretended a song was #39 that had already fallen out of the hot 100 in which only Peaked at number 49
It didn’t make it. Casey threw it in for reasons unknown.
December 20, 2025 at 5:08 PM
It didn’t make it. Casey threw it in for reasons unknown.
It sounds like a Spinners song because it was produced by Thom Bell, the man who produced the Spinners’ big hits.
December 19, 2025 at 2:56 AM
It sounds like a Spinners song because it was produced by Thom Bell, the man who produced the Spinners’ big hits.
What I love about “float on” is that it’s this overt branding exercise, yet incredibly, it worked! The song was massive. And then, having been successfully introduced to all the members of the floaters, the public decided they had no further interest in them.
November 21, 2025 at 5:52 PM
What I love about “float on” is that it’s this overt branding exercise, yet incredibly, it worked! The song was massive. And then, having been successfully introduced to all the members of the floaters, the public decided they had no further interest in them.
What’s the correct response?
November 10, 2025 at 1:13 AM
What’s the correct response?