Steven Quick
@stevenquick.bsky.social
Forest Ecologist | Research Associate at MSHI | Grad Student | Modeling post-eruption forest succession on Mount St Helens with LANDIS-II
Wow. What journal? We're planning to submit a couple next fall.
December 15, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Wow. What journal? We're planning to submit a couple next fall.
Is this regarding LANDIS or another modeling tool?
December 15, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Is this regarding LANDIS or another modeling tool?
They're calling it scheduled maintenance.
February 6, 2025 at 4:19 PM
They're calling it scheduled maintenance.
I'm not sure what data is available. With that being said, I'd be interested to know if forest land use changes there are significant enough to alter precipitation patterns. Another, maybe simpler idea would be trying to identify illegal deforestation/conversion activities from satellite imagery.
January 23, 2025 at 5:17 AM
I'm not sure what data is available. With that being said, I'd be interested to know if forest land use changes there are significant enough to alter precipitation patterns. Another, maybe simpler idea would be trying to identify illegal deforestation/conversion activities from satellite imagery.
1. Entrepreneur/Investor
2. Finance/Accounting
3. Natural Resources/Ecology/Environmental Studies (currently in grad school)
4. Research Associate at a Non Profit working on projects for the forest service
2. Finance/Accounting
3. Natural Resources/Ecology/Environmental Studies (currently in grad school)
4. Research Associate at a Non Profit working on projects for the forest service
January 23, 2025 at 4:16 AM
1. Entrepreneur/Investor
2. Finance/Accounting
3. Natural Resources/Ecology/Environmental Studies (currently in grad school)
4. Research Associate at a Non Profit working on projects for the forest service
2. Finance/Accounting
3. Natural Resources/Ecology/Environmental Studies (currently in grad school)
4. Research Associate at a Non Profit working on projects for the forest service
This logic doesn't track for me. Their control group still received regular water availability, so this might say less about drought-adaptation and more about irrigation augmentation.
In that case, it's better to have watered a tree and stopped then to have never watered it at all?
In that case, it's better to have watered a tree and stopped then to have never watered it at all?
January 13, 2025 at 9:13 PM
This logic doesn't track for me. Their control group still received regular water availability, so this might say less about drought-adaptation and more about irrigation augmentation.
In that case, it's better to have watered a tree and stopped then to have never watered it at all?
In that case, it's better to have watered a tree and stopped then to have never watered it at all?