With both Gana and Tim not available, I think we need to play KDH and Garner both in CM, with Alcaraz in front of them. If Keane is not back, then this will depend on whether Moyes trusts Patterson as RB. (Although I did like Garner as RB as he got forward much more.)

Thanks for your information. My take is to look as his record as a ref. W6, D8, L15 now 16 (after Sunday) this says a lot. On Sunday, it was multiple decisions during the game that stood out. Free kicks, corner kicks etc not given to Everton. We should expect impartial and consistent refereeing.

It would be interesting if you reviewed Pawson's record when in charge of games with Everton. There are multiple incidents which appear that he can't be impartial. Too many to be a coincidence.

Thanks for your analysis. However, it doesn't change the view that the PGMOL are inconsistent even in the same game ☹

Presumably there is not a scale to determine how bad the infringement is? A foul is a foul or does it have to be particular bad to warrant a free kick been given? It is difficult for a goalkeeper to punch the ball clear when he has been pushed, even slightly. Isn't the push just cheating?

Yes, I would be interested in your view about the incidents on the keeper at both ends of the pitch. VAR disallowed one goal for an infringement on the keeper impeding him making a save. Everton conceded two goals where the keeper was pushed which also reduce his ability to clear the ball.

Yes, Pickford needs to be stronger, but there is a push on him for both goals from the corner kicks. This, even though may be slight, prevented him getting to the ball. There is no difference between this and the infringement for the Everton disallowed goals. A foul is a foul.

It's not just the time wasting. What about not giving free kicks, corner kicks etc. OK the disallowed goal was agreed by Moyes because they got in the way of the keeper, but what about the push on Pickford for both goals, it certainly hindered his ability to make a save. These decisions change games

The waterfront development does look amazing. It will be great and regenerate the whole area. However, from a selfish point of view, it will ruin our view from the Upper South Concourse as we will no longer be able to see the city centre.

Too much wall space wasted were there could be more urinals.
There are too many womens toilets and two few gents in the area we are in the Upper South, so you have to walk further increasing congestion.

I did understand your post. Yes you can get back in time but I and many others haven't managed to get back in time.
It takes much longer for us than it did at Goodison. Concourse is too congested. Yes, the toilets are better, but they could be even better.

I haven't managed to the toilet at half time without missing the game.

Upper South Block 210. Concourse is packed. If you turn either way, first toilet is female both ways. In fact, in the Upper South, 4 of the 6 available toilets are female. The queues in the gents are longer than Goodison.

bsky.app/profile/ever...

[6/6] #LIVEVE is discussed in the previous post.

But in short, there's not enough to suggest Liverpool are 'helped' when counting injury time. Except for the frankly absurd decision in the derby.