@starsrlights2.bsky.social
Reposted
Summary:IMO this is a poorly-designed, egregiously unethical study. There is NO scientific evidence to support it.
To do it in Guinea Bissau is perfectly vile, and to farm it out to Denmark to avoid US ethics boards is disgraceful.
Would not be surprised if one of Hoeg’s buddies got the $$. 7/7
To do it in Guinea Bissau is perfectly vile, and to farm it out to Denmark to avoid US ethics boards is disgraceful.
Would not be surprised if one of Hoeg’s buddies got the $$. 7/7
public-inspection.federalregister.gov
December 17, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Summary:IMO this is a poorly-designed, egregiously unethical study. There is NO scientific evidence to support it.
To do it in Guinea Bissau is perfectly vile, and to farm it out to Denmark to avoid US ethics boards is disgraceful.
Would not be surprised if one of Hoeg’s buddies got the $$. 7/7
To do it in Guinea Bissau is perfectly vile, and to farm it out to Denmark to avoid US ethics boards is disgraceful.
Would not be surprised if one of Hoeg’s buddies got the $$. 7/7