{
"id": 1,
"name": "Alice",
"orders": ["Laptop", "Mouse"]
}
That’s why APIs prefer JSON, it naturally handles relationships like customers → orders or users → addresses.
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Alice",
"orders": ["Laptop", "Mouse"]
}
That’s why APIs prefer JSON, it naturally handles relationships like customers → orders or users → addresses.
customers.csv
1,Alice
2,Bob
orders.csv
101,1,Laptop
102,1,Mouse
103,2,Keyboard
Alice’s orders are linked because they share customer_id = 1
customers.csv
1,Alice
2,Bob
orders.csv
101,1,Laptop
102,1,Mouse
103,2,Keyboard
Alice’s orders are linked because they share customer_id = 1
Think of training an AI like teaching a student:
🏫 Training: You teach the student how to solve math problems (e.g., recognize cats in pictures).
✍️ Inference: The student is now tested with new questions — they apply what they learned to give you answers (e.g., “Yes, that’s a cat”).
Think of training an AI like teaching a student:
🏫 Training: You teach the student how to solve math problems (e.g., recognize cats in pictures).
✍️ Inference: The student is now tested with new questions — they apply what they learned to give you answers (e.g., “Yes, that’s a cat”).
✅ NVIDIA RTX 4090: ~82 TFLOPs 🎨🖥️
✅ Frontier Supercomputer: ~1.1 ExaFLOPs (1,100,000 TFLOPs) 🌌🚀
Analogy: If a 1 TFLOP CPU was a worker doing 1 billion calculations per second, a 1 ExaFLOP supercomputer would be a city of 1 million workers doing the same.
✅ NVIDIA RTX 4090: ~82 TFLOPs 🎨🖥️
✅ Frontier Supercomputer: ~1.1 ExaFLOPs (1,100,000 TFLOPs) 🌌🚀
Analogy: If a 1 TFLOP CPU was a worker doing 1 billion calculations per second, a 1 ExaFLOP supercomputer would be a city of 1 million workers doing the same.
Threads are instructions that a core can handle at once. A single core can switch between multiple threads, like a worker multitasking between two tasks.
Threads are instructions that a core can handle at once. A single core can switch between multiple threads, like a worker multitasking between two tasks.
⚖️ Faster or Slower? ⏩⏳ – Could speed up large number processing but also increase memory/bandwidth use.
Would it be worth the change? 🤔
⚖️ Faster or Slower? ⏩⏳ – Could speed up large number processing but also increase memory/bandwidth use.
Would it be worth the change? 🤔
Hardware limitations – Motherboards and CPUs physically can’t fit/address that much RAM.
OS constraints – Operating systems often restrict RAM usage based on version/edition.
Cost – RAM is expensive and not typically installed beyond practical need.
Hardware limitations – Motherboards and CPUs physically can’t fit/address that much RAM.
OS constraints – Operating systems often restrict RAM usage based on version/edition.
Cost – RAM is expensive and not typically installed beyond practical need.
macOS (Apple Silicon): currently supports up to 192 GB RAM
Linux (with proper kernel and configs): can support hundreds of TBs, depending on the architecture.
macOS (Apple Silicon): currently supports up to 192 GB RAM
Linux (with proper kernel and configs): can support hundreds of TBs, depending on the architecture.
Most consumer operating systems cap it around 128 GB to 2 TB. High-end servers and data centers may support 4 TB to 6 TB or more.
Most consumer operating systems cap it around 128 GB to 2 TB. High-end servers and data centers may support 4 TB to 6 TB or more.