After Dobbs, the right to contraception appears uncertain—but in this SLRO essay, Deborah Tuerkheimer argues the greater threats lie beyond the Court. Funding cuts, parental and conscience-based claims, and misinformation are eroding access even as formal protections remain.

In discussion with @theregreview.bsky.social, Matthew J. Sanders discusses his forthcoming SLR article on the “little-known but highly consequential” administrative-remand rule. Sanders will present his work as a part of SLR's 2026 Admin Law Symposium. www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/s...

SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Monday, September 15, at 5:00 PM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...

SLR Online Special Symposium Essays are now available on our website! We have 8 Essays about executive actions, constitutional boundaries, and the rule of law in Trump II. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/

SLR’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica portal open tomorrow, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT! We look forward to reviewing your submissions!

SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!

Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...

We are excited to announce our Special Symposium in partnership with the Stanford Neukom Center for the Rule of Law: “100 Days of The Trump Administration: Constitutional Boundaries on Executive Power & the Rule of Law.” review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...