standtall22.bsky.social
@standtall22.bsky.social
It’s hilarious. T is homophobic and BC will F anything that moves. Hilarious that T supporters are incandescent with rage at the possibility that their dear leader may have polished BC’s nob. It’s not that deep. Not D’s throat, not Clinton’s nob-not your beliefs, not the memes. Get a grip weirdo.
November 15, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Bubba-it’s because it’s less likely. We really don’t care either way. Other Bubba is the son of an Odessa oil owner= Ukrainian Oligarch=Russia ties=Putin.We will wait to see you make sense of that P reference any other way. When you’re ignorant of context you can’t understand anything.
November 15, 2025 at 4:25 PM
No way that happened.
November 15, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Entire estate file is available for review. See www.pbs.org/newshour/pol...
Oh-and don’t congratulate anyone for defection. Sit back and allow the Na*is to openly fight it out. 🍿 As always MTG is thinking about how best to keep MTG on the money train-cause a cross fit gym doesn’t pay the bills.
November 15, 2025 at 3:37 PM
MTG is trying out rebranding to stay on the $ train. No one is thanking her, patting her on the head or congratulating her. She’s still a POS who posts porn on the floor of Congress, harasses victims of gun violence (D. Hogg) and too much more to list. No one has forgotten. Pariah gets no oxygen.
November 15, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Well, that does apply to the oligarch class. The Zuckerbergs, Bezos, Thiels and Muskrats of this world. They want our labor for as close to free as we are willing to sell it and don’t much care if we are too sick to work. So yea, they are out to get all of us.
November 15, 2025 at 3:17 PM
This example is distinct from DT’s recent media threats of litigation. First, T was not present for the conversation. Also, Wolf is reciting JE claims and describing what JE had in his possession. Wolf never had the pics. DT can’t refute any of what Wolf published because JE is dead. All heresay.
November 15, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Federal lawsuit in 3-2-1…..
November 15, 2025 at 6:19 AM
Oh look! An unindicted co-conspirator! The one who claimed to keep his underpants on for massages.
November 15, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Pal, no one over here is “confused.” You weren’t alive to see it. I was. Goodbye.
November 15, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Of course not. It applied to political discourse. I was alive when it was around. Were you?
November 15, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Word salad is how others reply when the writer wrote a complete sentence the reader can’t understand. Or they do but the merit of the idea doesn’t fit their internal narrative. That’s a you problem.
November 15, 2025 at 2:17 AM
Or perhaps you’re someone who games all day and doesn’t get out much so conspiracy theories really take hold. Sorry, good luck and goodbye.
November 15, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Of course the economy has nothing to with that, or the Viet Nam war. You’re being silly. And how has Fox changed? Or were you alive? I can tell you. It went from being mildly pro conservative/reporting live news to being openly right wing/racist. When the talking heads came into the fore for ratings
November 15, 2025 at 2:11 AM
The FD allowed the space for people to hear about matters related to what a democratic society expects of itself re the responsibility of citizenship. Ignorance is a breeding ground for violence and here we are. It was important and helpful. And it was impactful to both parties.
November 15, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Don’t be ridiculous. As you see from what I post.
November 15, 2025 at 1:57 AM
At core it’s re imminent incitement. Brandenburg. Are Americans ok w that? Like we are with extending the 2nd? Digital and cable tech are the advocacy/passive highways that allow for organized violence. This is the Meta debate. And we need to solve it where the nexus is violence. It’s untenable.
November 15, 2025 at 1:56 AM
You can do that for yourself. I’m not your 1L instructor. Start with Black’s Law Dictionary. Context matters.
November 15, 2025 at 1:30 AM
What are your answers to mine? You seem to have something in mind? What is it?
November 15, 2025 at 1:27 AM
But yet it was so important to Ailes that he demanded Reagan act to eliminate it. The history since is revelatory. And I understand the difference between public/private “airways.” Yet here we are. Speech-incites violence on the Capitol. And the method to reach multi millions incurs no consequence.
November 15, 2025 at 1:26 AM
I want a creative legal solution to incitement to violence without consequence for the vehicle for its comms. The FD regulated public airways not cable. It was constitutional. Now digital reaches everyone. Theres a nexus between ignorance of public policy and violence. Try being part of a solution.
November 15, 2025 at 1:15 AM
I’m well aware of the second as it stands now and you’re wrong on the first. Depends on the facts.
November 15, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Try not to be an asshole to an ally. Maybe work on that.
November 15, 2025 at 12:48 AM
I like every other American do not want to see infirm or ill intentioned ppl incited to violence without consequence for the powerful intermediaries. Or are you content on this trajectory? Be a grown up. Have a reasoned discussion. It’s an Amendment. Like the 2nd. Where are the lines?
November 15, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Every day they get closer to that line. They’re the preferred vehicle utilized for incitement and the nexus in the right case with the right fact pattern will sadly emerge. The 1st A has some limits at its outer edges about violence. Time for a reasoned discussion. It’s an amendment. Like the 2nd
November 15, 2025 at 12:42 AM