♂ Dad of 3 👧🏼👦🏼👧🏼
👨🔬🧪Assoc. Prof. at Ghent University
Views my own
🧬 Scientist (ORCID: 0000-0003-2664-3357)
🤓 Nerd (RPGs, Linux, Plan9, Plant Breeding, ...)
🗽Progressive centrist (liberal)
🇪🇺 Euro federalist (Volt)
⚛️ Atheist
I think that is short sighted.
I think that is short sighted.
In principle, having a review time of 8 days or 100 days is not substantially different, because you as a reviewer do not work all that time on it (typically only close to the deadline)
In principle, having a review time of 8 days or 100 days is not substantially different, because you as a reviewer do not work all that time on it (typically only close to the deadline)
Det var redan problem med den lägsta dosen under uppbyggnadsfasen
Det var redan problem med den lägsta dosen under uppbyggnadsfasen
app.genebass.org/gene/ENSG000...
app.genebass.org/gene/ENSG000...
The size might however be limiting with about 300K sequences linked to patient records. Ideally, we should have an EU-wide database based on the UK biobank model.
The size might however be limiting with about 300K sequences linked to patient records. Ideally, we should have an EU-wide database based on the UK biobank model.
Mina anteckningar på möten etc mår bäst av den kaotiska fri-formen man får med penna och papper. De gånger jag försökt knappa in saker så distraherar det mer än det hjälper.
Mina anteckningar på möten etc mår bäst av den kaotiska fri-formen man får med penna och papper. De gånger jag försökt knappa in saker så distraherar det mer än det hjälper.