spiderbatfrog.bsky.social
@spiderbatfrog.bsky.social
Bloody hell, Henry, you've stirred up a proper hornets' nest of shrieking wankers with this one.
December 4, 2025 at 7:58 PM
You seem to be irate. Have some elderly people got in your way in the M&S Food hall recently? Seen any annoying semicolons that you dislike? Some women wanting female-only spaces?
November 26, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Oooh, the lesser-spotted "ageist wanker" and "punctuation Nazi" combo, there's a bingo card I hadn't expected to cash in any time soon.
November 26, 2025 at 12:18 AM
"Biological male who identifies as a woman" is a helpful summary which succinctly identifies the salient points.
November 26, 2025 at 12:07 AM
I don't know, you'd have to ask them. While you're there, ask them if they're dragging women out of public restrooms because of the upswing in men in their restrooms over the last fifteen years or so, courtesy of your gender-enthusiast mates.
November 12, 2025 at 12:02 AM
I mean, we judge that men aren't women and vice versa, but that won't surprise anyone. What other judgementalism are you concerned about?

And really, I think anyone on the pro-gender side of the fence has a hell of a brass neck accusing anyone else of judgementalism.
November 11, 2025 at 11:46 PM
That's a lovely post, thanks Margaret.
November 11, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Cheek swab?
November 11, 2025 at 12:25 AM
It's fine, they can take a one-off cheek swab and enjoy the rest of their sporting career. And in the meantime they can be confident that they aren't having to compete against male athletes.
November 11, 2025 at 12:22 AM
The platform's fine, it's some of the users that are the problem. Anyway, I'm perfectly transparent about my beliefs; you just don't like one of them.
November 10, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Well, no one other than women and girls, anyway.
November 10, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Thank you for all your hard work!
November 10, 2025 at 7:22 PM
About time!
November 10, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Is anyone making a genuine, good-faith assertion that Rose isn't male?
November 10, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Of course it would, but in a case that (for whatever reason) hinged upon the person's ethnicity or heritage, it would be weird for the article to not mention it. I don't think that being male or of, say, Zambian descent, are inherently negative attributes that need to be delicately elided.
November 10, 2025 at 4:19 PM
I know that's how you see it, but it begs the question of whether or not Rose is a woman, which is the point of contention.
November 10, 2025 at 11:10 AM
The entire point of the case is that he's a man who identifies as a woman. "Women object to a woman using the women's changing room" would be grossly misleading and would completely gloss over the actual problem.
November 10, 2025 at 10:14 AM
It's amazing how well those programmes still hold up!
October 29, 2025 at 5:39 PM
"Trans bash back": the distress call of the thwarted misogynistic thug. Great article, thank you.
October 17, 2025 at 11:29 PM
I didn't blame her, no doubt she's instructed to ask the question and on reflection she could probably have done without me being an arse about it. I just wasn't expecting it!
October 16, 2025 at 7:20 PM
I said something flippant like "I'd be quite surprised", which elicited a flat stare, so I then clarified that I wouldn't be pregnant on the grounds of being the wrong sex for it.
October 16, 2025 at 7:18 PM
I am a large, hairy man. A few months ago I went to get my spine x-rayed and was asked sheepishly if I might be pregnant.
October 16, 2025 at 2:34 PM
And the deranged misogynists on this platform will be falling over each other to declare that he belongs in a women's prison.
October 1, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Have you tried reading what she actually wrote?
September 16, 2025 at 11:16 AM
The Communist Party of Britain is a gender critical organisation, which by your reasoning would seem to group them with Nazis.
September 16, 2025 at 9:42 AM