The banner shows a zoomed in section of a protest sign that says, You can’t jail the revolution. PFP is a pink question mark on a black board
Photos by Emily Morter and Clay Banks
If this kind of thing is happening in your own life it may help to talk about it with the ppl at www.thehotline.org The hotline will chat with you no matter what kind of living situation you’re in.
I will not be responding to reskeets or replies.
Heathline article on verbal abuse
If this kind of thing is happening in your own life it may help to talk about it with the ppl at www.thehotline.org The hotline will chat with you no matter what kind of living situation you’re in.
I will not be responding to reskeets or replies.
Heathline article on verbal abuse
“It’s a kindness.” This is gaslighting. Telling ppl that you will react poorly if they don’t do what you want, is not a kindness, it’s a threat.
You can read more about this kind of language in the linked Healthline article. See 6 blame, 9 gaslighting and 11 threats.
“It’s a kindness.” This is gaslighting. Telling ppl that you will react poorly if they don’t do what you want, is not a kindness, it’s a threat.
You can read more about this kind of language in the linked Healthline article. See 6 blame, 9 gaslighting and 11 threats.
“how I’m moments from responding.” This is in reference to the previous skeet she sent saying “Please don’t so I can remain kind.” It is also a threat.
“how I’m moments from responding.” This is in reference to the previous skeet she sent saying “Please don’t so I can remain kind.” It is also a threat.
Again, Anonsee is in full control of her own actions. If she wants to be ‘unkind’ that’s her own choice. It has nothing to do with other ppls actions. She could just as easily choose to game.
Again, Anonsee is in full control of her own actions. If she wants to be ‘unkind’ that’s her own choice. It has nothing to do with other ppls actions. She could just as easily choose to game.
“I’m not blaming, I’m warning” This is a threat. She’s threatening that if people continue to try her patience she will start acting in ‘unkind’ ways. This was stated in a previous skeet with “Please don’t (keep lying) so I can remain kind.”
“I’m not blaming, I’m warning” This is a threat. She’s threatening that if people continue to try her patience she will start acting in ‘unkind’ ways. This was stated in a previous skeet with “Please don’t (keep lying) so I can remain kind.”
When called on it she might use the “I’m saying it literally” defense or “don’t put words in my mouth”. If she did say those things it would be gaslighting and possibly an example of DARVO. Please see a link at the end for further info on DARVO.
When called on it she might use the “I’m saying it literally” defense or “don’t put words in my mouth”. If she did say those things it would be gaslighting and possibly an example of DARVO. Please see a link at the end for further info on DARVO.
Using ‘unkind’ is also what’s called a veiled threat. When someone uses a veiled threat it’s so that they can have plausible deniability. You know and she knows that she doesn’t actually mean ‘unkind’, she means something worse.
Using ‘unkind’ is also what’s called a veiled threat. When someone uses a veiled threat it’s so that they can have plausible deniability. You know and she knows that she doesn’t actually mean ‘unkind’, she means something worse.
The use of ‘unkind’ is deliberate so that if someone calls her out (like I am) she can say they’re over reacting. What’s the big deal about being unkind, she might say? That’s not a real threat. If she were to respond that way it would be gaslighting.
The use of ‘unkind’ is deliberate so that if someone calls her out (like I am) she can say they’re over reacting. What’s the big deal about being unkind, she might say? That’s not a real threat. If she were to respond that way it would be gaslighting.
“You know I take poorly to being lied about. Please stop so I can remain kind.” This is blaming language. She’s blaming another person for her possible future actions. It’s threatening language because the implication is that if you don’t stop, she will be ‘unkind’.
“You know I take poorly to being lied about. Please stop so I can remain kind.” This is blaming language. She’s blaming another person for her possible future actions. It’s threatening language because the implication is that if you don’t stop, she will be ‘unkind’.
She states that her patience is shot because crackers have been lying about her. That’s probably true. It would wear my patience out too. What she says next is the problem. From the previous skeet.
She states that her patience is shot because crackers have been lying about her. That’s probably true. It would wear my patience out too. What she says next is the problem. From the previous skeet.
My main point is that no matter her patience level, Anonsee is always in control of her own behavior. No one makes her respond in a certain way. Her response is always, always under her control.
My main point is that no matter her patience level, Anonsee is always in control of her own behavior. No one makes her respond in a certain way. Her response is always, always under her control.
I used ‘this person’ in the first skeet in the hope of avoiding a name search.
I’m continuing here for anyone that might have questions or recognize this kind of language from their own lives.
I used ‘this person’ in the first skeet in the hope of avoiding a name search.
I’m continuing here for anyone that might have questions or recognize this kind of language from their own lives.
Their goal (like that of any tyrant or cult leader) is to become the arbiters of reality.
Their goal (like that of any tyrant or cult leader) is to become the arbiters of reality.