Spamantha Risk
@spamantharisk.bsky.social
Where does she think she should have been placed? What does that mean?????
November 6, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Where does she think she should have been placed? What does that mean?????
Agreed, I was actually very encouraged that some Frey voters apparently considered Becka beyond the pale
November 5, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Agreed, I was actually very encouraged that some Frey voters apparently considered Becka beyond the pale
What is this place???
October 8, 2025 at 12:01 AM
What is this place???
Came here to say this! I did almost all my reading on public transit until the pandemic (and having kids, which of course didn’t help lol). Would telling people that expanding public transit will get people to read more do anything?
October 7, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Came here to say this! I did almost all my reading on public transit until the pandemic (and having kids, which of course didn’t help lol). Would telling people that expanding public transit will get people to read more do anything?
Reposted by Spamantha Risk
This is notable because the government isn’t supposed to indefinitely hold people in immigration detention just for funsies if it doesn’t plan to remove the person any time soon. Abrego’s counsel has raised SCOTUS case law to that effect in seeking his release
bsky.app/profile/anna...
bsky.app/profile/anna...
The government said it was going to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Uganda. Then it said Eswatini.
But today, a DOJ attorney just told a federal judge that they haven't formalized a plan for removal yet. They apparently haven't even contacted Eswatini about the plan to remove Abrego there.
But today, a DOJ attorney just told a federal judge that they haven't formalized a plan for removal yet. They apparently haven't even contacted Eswatini about the plan to remove Abrego there.
O'H: YH, we--
J: is that a no?
O'H: respondents haven't formalized a poarticular plan for removal yet. gov'ts position is taht under Zadvydas govt has 6 months
J: so answer is no?
O'H: i can't make that representation. we dont know.
J: then answer is no.
/14
J: is that a no?
O'H: respondents haven't formalized a poarticular plan for removal yet. gov'ts position is taht under Zadvydas govt has 6 months
J: so answer is no?
O'H: i can't make that representation. we dont know.
J: then answer is no.
/14
October 6, 2025 at 3:05 PM
This is notable because the government isn’t supposed to indefinitely hold people in immigration detention just for funsies if it doesn’t plan to remove the person any time soon. Abrego’s counsel has raised SCOTUS case law to that effect in seeking his release
bsky.app/profile/anna...
bsky.app/profile/anna...
Reposted by Spamantha Risk
There are any number of legitimate reasons to use the passive voice, including not knowing who did the action you’re describing, or the whom is more interesting/germane than the who.
Exonerating the Gestapo is not one of those legitimate reasons.
Exonerating the Gestapo is not one of those legitimate reasons.
October 4, 2025 at 7:08 PM
There are any number of legitimate reasons to use the passive voice, including not knowing who did the action you’re describing, or the whom is more interesting/germane than the who.
Exonerating the Gestapo is not one of those legitimate reasons.
Exonerating the Gestapo is not one of those legitimate reasons.