I am Dilfbert's assassinated corpse
@soymethdad.bsky.social
No
And the Labor party
December 22, 2025 at 11:14 AM
And the Labor party
Can't wait until they try to make "from the river to the sea" illegal unless you are a Likud member
December 21, 2025 at 10:11 AM
Can't wait until they try to make "from the river to the sea" illegal unless you are a Likud member
Janet doesn't do "facts" and neither does her employer
December 12, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Janet doesn't do "facts" and neither does her employer
Frankly Pauline, we wouldn't have you
November 30, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Frankly Pauline, we wouldn't have you
Honestly, why bother? You'd be better off trying to take over the Melbourne Uni student union... Oh right
November 17, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Honestly, why bother? You'd be better off trying to take over the Melbourne Uni student union... Oh right
The laws pre-date Dutton. They actually derive from the original Immigration Restriction Act 1901. Think Victorian era thought about moral turpitude, etc.
But POC, definitely.
But POC, definitely.
November 16, 2025 at 11:31 PM
The laws pre-date Dutton. They actually derive from the original Immigration Restriction Act 1901. Think Victorian era thought about moral turpitude, etc.
But POC, definitely.
But POC, definitely.
This isn't how migration law works. The Minister has been characterised as possessing "God like powers". I can see at least 3 grounds on which the Minister may move to cancel:
- 501(6)(b) Member of a group
- (6)(c) Gen conduct
- (6)(d) person risk vilify / incide discord
(d) likely best
- 501(6)(b) Member of a group
- (6)(c) Gen conduct
- (6)(d) person risk vilify / incide discord
(d) likely best
November 16, 2025 at 11:17 PM
This isn't how migration law works. The Minister has been characterised as possessing "God like powers". I can see at least 3 grounds on which the Minister may move to cancel:
- 501(6)(b) Member of a group
- (6)(c) Gen conduct
- (6)(d) person risk vilify / incide discord
(d) likely best
- 501(6)(b) Member of a group
- (6)(c) Gen conduct
- (6)(d) person risk vilify / incide discord
(d) likely best
Glad to see no one at Anthropic has even read or seen a work of science fiction.
venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic...
venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic...
October 31, 2025 at 9:02 AM
Glad to see no one at Anthropic has even read or seen a work of science fiction.
venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic...
venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic...
Imagine suggesting doing anything the "Seppo way" at this point. This sort of faux "tough on crime" bs ignores all the evidence and replaces it with conservatives' feefees
October 26, 2025 at 8:44 AM
Imagine suggesting doing anything the "Seppo way" at this point. This sort of faux "tough on crime" bs ignores all the evidence and replaces it with conservatives' feefees
![Extract from Wikipedia article "Civilian casualties from the United States drone strikes"
#Approvals of drone strikes
During the Obama administration, proposed U.S. drone strikes in locations outside active war zones (i.e., in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia) required high-level approval.[24][25] The Obama administration process for approving drone strikes in such locations featured centralized, high-level oversight, based on intelligence about individuals suspected of terrorism activity.[25] Obama's approval was required for every strike in Yemen and Somalia, as well as "the more complex and risky strikes in Pakistan" (about one-third of the total as of 2012), and insisted on deciding whether to approve a strike unless the CIA had a "near certainty" that no civilian deaths would result.[24] The process, formalized in a 2013 Presidential Policy Guidance document, was intended to reduce civilian casualties and blowback risks by requiring the targeted person to present a "continuing and imminent threat" to Americans.[25] The process often required multiple interagency meetings to decide whether to go forward with a strike.[25] However, some U.S. military and intelligence officials opposed the restrictive nature of the system,[25] and some Republicans criticized it as too cautious.[24] However, in the pre-strike review, Obama "embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties" that effectively counted "all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent."[24] Counterterrorism officials defended this approach on the idea that people located in close proximity to known terrorists were likely combatants; some Obama administration officials were critical of this approach, who said that it led to implausibly low official counts of civilian deaths, with one administration official telling the New York Times that it amounted to "guilt by association."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:pembolnjf2k32tuvi4cum5yd/bafkreih47wp7itxqhxwp273wytp7stnzd6ngun4aaa6bkzdy2575r6iuti@jpeg)
October 8, 2025 at 11:30 PM
It's also fundamentally discriminatory. No one can tell you what "neuro typical" is because everyone's brain is different.
September 22, 2025 at 11:44 AM
It's also fundamentally discriminatory. No one can tell you what "neuro typical" is because everyone's brain is different.
Wild thing for someone with this academic background to say
September 19, 2025 at 11:36 AM
Wild thing for someone with this academic background to say
Even this article needs to frame old information as "new". Apparently we couldn't take his (repeated) statements at face value until now and only now because something something Epstein.
July 22, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Even this article needs to frame old information as "new". Apparently we couldn't take his (repeated) statements at face value until now and only now because something something Epstein.
Up there with Microsoft's Tay. The wikipedia page now specifically references Grok
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(ch...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(ch...
July 9, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Up there with Microsoft's Tay. The wikipedia page now specifically references Grok
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(ch...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(ch...
Mainstream media take their talking points from Republicans. Prove me wrong.
July 8, 2025 at 6:32 AM
Mainstream media take their talking points from Republicans. Prove me wrong.
The collapse of the most elite media institutions in the US has been obvious for some time. But now they're just wholly captive to, and actively disseminating, his fantasy realm.
June 24, 2025 at 12:59 AM
The collapse of the most elite media institutions in the US has been obvious for some time. But now they're just wholly captive to, and actively disseminating, his fantasy realm.
Seems about right
June 20, 2025 at 10:38 PM
Seems about right
Trans panic island at it again
June 15, 2025 at 7:26 AM
Trans panic island at it again
Got this reddit ad the other day...
June 10, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Got this reddit ad the other day...
Spoiler Alert: it won't
March 31, 2025 at 9:46 AM
Spoiler Alert: it won't
Spoiler: it won't
March 31, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Spoiler: it won't
She's aged poorly
March 26, 2025 at 10:40 AM
She's aged poorly