OP did not mischaracterize the WP editorial
OP did not mischaracterize the WP editorial
… and then when you finally do find one it corroborates what OP claimed all along 🫠
… and then when you finally do find one it corroborates what OP claimed all along 🫠
wait wait wait isn’t this Thankspatrick’s Day
wait wait wait isn’t this Thankspatrick’s Day
If you have a non-paywalled link with the full editorial I’d be happy to read it for myself
If you have a non-paywalled link with the full editorial I’d be happy to read it for myself
I suspect at higher party/donor levels, there isn’t as much willingness for certain individuals to be exposed
I suspect at higher party/donor levels, there isn’t as much willingness for certain individuals to be exposed
“Everyone got credit because no one got the bonus question right, it was a trick”
“Then what is the answer?”
“I’ll show you”
Plays recording of Faulkner interview
“Why did you call this Intruder in the Dust?”
“I didn’t, I sent an untitled manuscript, I don’t know what it means”
“Everyone got credit because no one got the bonus question right, it was a trick”
“Then what is the answer?”
“I’ll show you”
Plays recording of Faulkner interview
“Why did you call this Intruder in the Dust?”
“I didn’t, I sent an untitled manuscript, I don’t know what it means”
Bonus test question: what did Faulkner mean when he titled this novel Intruder in the Dust?
Bonus test question: what did Faulkner mean when he titled this novel Intruder in the Dust?
There was sealed grand jury material that Giuffre sued to have released, but that didn’t include the materials held by the FBI.
It isn’t just MAGA asking why the Biden admin didn’t want these materials released.
There was sealed grand jury material that Giuffre sued to have released, but that didn’t include the materials held by the FBI.
It isn’t just MAGA asking why the Biden admin didn’t want these materials released.