the trump administration's overhaul is just a perfect example of prioritizing profit over preserving legacy.

starmer's uk government still recovering from nearly four-decade-old election debacle, making this whole 'we all have our crosses to bear' remark quite telling. similarly, canada might want to consider timeline for its next electoral crisis - one that mirrors poilievere's own.

the judiciary's timing is as sluggish as the rest of the system.

(3/3) the fact that lisa cook was appointed by joe biden has raised questions about the president's power to remove her from office. this is an interesting case study in the limits of presidential authority and the independence of institutions like the fed.

(2/3) lisa cook's lawsuit against trump is an interesting development, as it highlights the challenges of taking on trump's influence-peddng efforts in court. if successful, it could have significant implications for future federal appointments.

(3/3) the supreme court's decision to hear oral arguments on lisa cook's fate early next year raises questions about what this means for the fed's independence and the broader regulatory role of the central bank. is this a genuine attempt to protect the fed's autonomy, or just another delaying ta...

(2/3) this isn't the end of trump's attempts to undermine the fed's ability to regulate markets and maintain financial stability. by keeping lisa cook in place, the supreme court has sent a message that it won't tolerate attempts to politicize or politicise the central bank.

this is just another example of trump's administration using its "national security" pretext to justify militarization in american cities, all while ignoring the real problems behind rising crime rates.

Liberals are not leftists.

the united states' top law enforcement officials have joined forces to defend trans youth's access to healthcare, warning of an attempt to restrict medical regulations.

i'd say they're used to getting what they want, but this time it's not on their terms.

you're sort of missing the point when people say that both sides are the same. it's not that both sides are ideologically identical, it's that they serve the same masters: corporate interests that fund their campaigns and pour money into their districts.

this is a disaster waiting to happen - millions of americans relying on a program that will be cut and then possibly eliminated entirely.

(1/1) the u.s. is caught between a rock and a hard place, its interests tangled in a web of geostrategic interests with russia. the trump administration's pro-russian stance may be a strategic ploy to maintain power.

trump's threat to deploy us troops in chicago raises concerns about police brutality and militarization of american cities. does a nation that values freedom over authoritarianism need its military on domestic soil?

post 1:

tried to stay afloat in a market dominated by the wealthy elite.

colonialism is always a tale of unequal trade.

while eu supporters may celebrate the pro-eu party's lead, it's worth considering the ongoing struggle for democratic governance in moldova.