@soulofaginger.bsky.social
#PTSD when untreated, tends to get worse. Combat PTSD with an untreated servicemember puts society at risk. That is why the current VA focuses so heavily on combat related PTSD. The problem is, the DC attacker was a CIA asset, not an agent or a soldier, amd he was not taken care of.
December 3, 2025 at 2:57 PM
#PTSD when untreated, tends to get worse. Combat PTSD with an untreated servicemember puts society at risk. That is why the current VA focuses so heavily on combat related PTSD. The problem is, the DC attacker was a CIA asset, not an agent or a soldier, amd he was not taken care of.
I do not, and I'm glad I missed that fad.
October 25, 2025 at 3:01 PM
I do not, and I'm glad I missed that fad.
I just continued the conversatio from the context of not enabling the individuals this whole thing was in response to.
PS, it was probably wise of you to leave FB behind.
PS, it was probably wise of you to leave FB behind.
October 14, 2025 at 9:17 PM
I just continued the conversatio from the context of not enabling the individuals this whole thing was in response to.
PS, it was probably wise of you to leave FB behind.
PS, it was probably wise of you to leave FB behind.
Sorry, we were having different conversatio s at the same time. I kept mine laser focused on the discussion that some GACC people tried to throw at me, and my responses. That's what these videos are. Nothing was hypothetical, or randomly brought up. I understand where you were going with this.
October 14, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Sorry, we were having different conversatio s at the same time. I kept mine laser focused on the discussion that some GACC people tried to throw at me, and my responses. That's what these videos are. Nothing was hypothetical, or randomly brought up. I understand where you were going with this.
A parent to try to abuse their kid into staying in the closet.
October 14, 2025 at 4:23 PM
A parent to try to abuse their kid into staying in the closet.
Level knowledge, that is one thing. If, as a parent, you want to deny gender affirming care to the rest of the country for religious or selfish reasons, that is another. Your kid is either straight, or not, either trans, or not. Seeing others kids won't change them, it just makes it harder for
October 14, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Level knowledge, that is one thing. If, as a parent, you want to deny gender affirming care to the rest of the country for religious or selfish reasons, that is another. Your kid is either straight, or not, either trans, or not. Seeing others kids won't change them, it just makes it harder for
I'm aware of bad medical opinions, and giw the government amd corporations can use money and power to force a voncensus they prefer over peer reviewed science. As lay-people, we still do not get a medical opinion- we have lay-opinions. If, through personal experience, you develope professional
October 14, 2025 at 4:21 PM
I'm aware of bad medical opinions, and giw the government amd corporations can use money and power to force a voncensus they prefer over peer reviewed science. As lay-people, we still do not get a medical opinion- we have lay-opinions. If, through personal experience, you develope professional
Point number 2: a large enough group of enablers can pursued politicians to enact laws over medical care, banning what the medical community has concluded is helpful, and protecting religious quackery that the medical community has determined to be abusive.
October 14, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Point number 2: a large enough group of enablers can pursued politicians to enact laws over medical care, banning what the medical community has concluded is helpful, and protecting religious quackery that the medical community has determined to be abusive.
Information was brought to light. At that point you can try to reason with a person who is incapable of reason, or walk away. By giving them the argument, you give them what they want, which at that point is just to get under your skin. That way, you enable their behavior despite disagreeing.
October 14, 2025 at 9:46 AM
Information was brought to light. At that point you can try to reason with a person who is incapable of reason, or walk away. By giving them the argument, you give them what they want, which at that point is just to get under your skin. That way, you enable their behavior despite disagreeing.
The conversation that spawned the discussion demonstrated that the person who held the dangerousnposition either dod not know what they were talking about or they knew they were spreadinf false information. It became clear that the intent was maicious when they continued on after the false
October 14, 2025 at 9:44 AM
The conversation that spawned the discussion demonstrated that the person who held the dangerousnposition either dod not know what they were talking about or they knew they were spreadinf false information. It became clear that the intent was maicious when they continued on after the false