So GINA for faceprints? That's the next step if this gets out of containment

3/3 So what was so disingenuous to me about the article? It was an ad to get lawyers to use LexisNexis's AI, wrapped in "concern" for their clients.

Will they absolve attorney users of liability for use if their model is inaccurate? Will they provide notice of CA court's requirements?

2/3 Are there security and privacy (attorney-client) risks to using Open Source models? Sure, but that is unrelated to the *accuracy* of the model

CA courts announced rules around the use of AI—completely unrelated to the origin (Open Source of it all) of the model.

www.foley.com/p/102l07z/ca....

Herbs and Rye off the strip makes a mean old fashioned and ribeye 👌

Thanks for sharing!

Are these the same ones whose glasses thought zoo animals were demons in disguise, sparking an online conspiracy theory that zoo animals are literally covert agents from hell? Or different group of AI glasses folks?

My personal gripe about the topic is that most people I interact with see the issue as black or white. The world is frequently gray, nowadays its 3 LLMs in a trench coat. And there's a famous saying about humans trying to force life into their own box of ideals - notoriously a terrible idea.

Brothers killing brothers, fathers killing sons is always a visceral description. Sitting with that and thinking about the circumstances that would drive that special type of violence, and the PTSD that they'd have to live with.

I see their vision, and I hope they'll end up with something productive. If companies thought they were playing Whack-A-Mole under state privacy laws, its about to get a lot more fragmented.