Social Cara
@socialcara.bsky.social
Scottsdale resident, business owner, wife and mother
So to clarify again… we are in complete agreement that Tylenol is useful. Fever and headaches are relieved.
My comment to you is that just because it’s helpful, doesn’t mean it isn’t without risk(see label) and if studies reveal any findings, we should be able to receive that info. That’s all.
My comment to you is that just because it’s helpful, doesn’t mean it isn’t without risk(see label) and if studies reveal any findings, we should be able to receive that info. That’s all.
September 30, 2025 at 4:40 PM
So to clarify again… we are in complete agreement that Tylenol is useful. Fever and headaches are relieved.
My comment to you is that just because it’s helpful, doesn’t mean it isn’t without risk(see label) and if studies reveal any findings, we should be able to receive that info. That’s all.
My comment to you is that just because it’s helpful, doesn’t mean it isn’t without risk(see label) and if studies reveal any findings, we should be able to receive that info. That’s all.
I’m not sure I follow your logic. However, I do agree that Tylenol is needed as a pain reliever. I’m not sure it’s the only option during pregnancy.
I guess for me, I would want to know the research before putting my baby at risk.
That’s all.
I guess for me, I would want to know the research before putting my baby at risk.
That’s all.
September 30, 2025 at 1:29 AM
I’m not sure I follow your logic. However, I do agree that Tylenol is needed as a pain reliever. I’m not sure it’s the only option during pregnancy.
I guess for me, I would want to know the research before putting my baby at risk.
That’s all.
I guess for me, I would want to know the research before putting my baby at risk.
That’s all.
So again, I agree, there’s no link to autism from the Tylenol post. But you have to admit, the post implies some risk of something to pregnant women. So, now we need to figure out what.
September 29, 2025 at 1:09 AM
So again, I agree, there’s no link to autism from the Tylenol post. But you have to admit, the post implies some risk of something to pregnant women. So, now we need to figure out what.
That’s not what they wrote? Please see their post here
September 29, 2025 at 1:08 AM
That’s not what they wrote? Please see their post here
I would broaden that statement to include all Americans. We should all have that right to privacy.
September 27, 2025 at 7:17 PM
I would broaden that statement to include all Americans. We should all have that right to privacy.
As a sincere question not meant to bait in any way… how do you explain the 2017 post by the makers of Tylenol warning pregnant women not to take any of their products during pregnancy? Clearly it doesn’t connect a dot to autism of course, but it lends to the possibility of some uncertain risks, no?
September 27, 2025 at 7:15 PM
As a sincere question not meant to bait in any way… how do you explain the 2017 post by the makers of Tylenol warning pregnant women not to take any of their products during pregnancy? Clearly it doesn’t connect a dot to autism of course, but it lends to the possibility of some uncertain risks, no?
I’ve done nothing to you. Anyone following our thread can see who the aggressor is.
Clearly you don’t want to have the conversation. You just want to threaten. There’s something wrong with that, but that’s all yours to deal with.
Have a beautiful day! 😊
Clearly you don’t want to have the conversation. You just want to threaten. There’s something wrong with that, but that’s all yours to deal with.
Have a beautiful day! 😊
September 20, 2025 at 7:03 PM
I’ve done nothing to you. Anyone following our thread can see who the aggressor is.
Clearly you don’t want to have the conversation. You just want to threaten. There’s something wrong with that, but that’s all yours to deal with.
Have a beautiful day! 😊
Clearly you don’t want to have the conversation. You just want to threaten. There’s something wrong with that, but that’s all yours to deal with.
Have a beautiful day! 😊
How sweet! You obsessed about me enough to find me on the Internet…..that’s not creepy at all.
… and shucks, I didn’t get you anything. 🙃
… and shucks, I didn’t get you anything. 🙃
September 20, 2025 at 3:06 PM
How sweet! You obsessed about me enough to find me on the Internet…..that’s not creepy at all.
… and shucks, I didn’t get you anything. 🙃
… and shucks, I didn’t get you anything. 🙃
It’s just as cute when you can take them with.
September 19, 2025 at 4:07 PM
It’s just as cute when you can take them with.
Love it. You continue to show yourself to be the one who is without a position to stand on so you resort to insults. In debate, they call that concession. Thank you for the W. 😆
September 19, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Love it. You continue to show yourself to be the one who is without a position to stand on so you resort to insults. In debate, they call that concession. Thank you for the W. 😆
I wonder what portion of that reduction was credited to Ai replacing the work force as businesses are scaling back to allow for…?
September 19, 2025 at 2:17 PM
I wonder what portion of that reduction was credited to Ai replacing the work force as businesses are scaling back to allow for…?
My favorite president? You don’t even know me. So you think because I question you, I’m against you on another side? I hope you hear the error in that. Forget how trump or Kirk spoke. You should hear yourself and YOU speak to others. It’s shameful. And you aren’t immune to the standards you compare
September 19, 2025 at 2:12 PM
My favorite president? You don’t even know me. So you think because I question you, I’m against you on another side? I hope you hear the error in that. Forget how trump or Kirk spoke. You should hear yourself and YOU speak to others. It’s shameful. And you aren’t immune to the standards you compare
Why? Unlike you, I don’t want to stay in the echo chamber. But you’ve just proven that you do. Good luck to you.
September 19, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Why? Unlike you, I don’t want to stay in the echo chamber. But you’ve just proven that you do. Good luck to you.
That’s debatable. In yet you won’t debate. You just want to disparage. And that’s why a conversation can’t be had.
September 19, 2025 at 2:08 PM
That’s debatable. In yet you won’t debate. You just want to disparage. And that’s why a conversation can’t be had.
I sure hope you don’t kiss your mom with that mouth. Shameful.
September 19, 2025 at 2:05 AM
I sure hope you don’t kiss your mom with that mouth. Shameful.
Of course it is. It’s an app. Have you tried PixVerse? It’s pretty cool. So yes. I submitted a picture and chose an effect (zooming into my eye). The effect is Ai. Pretty cool
September 19, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Of course it is. It’s an app. Have you tried PixVerse? It’s pretty cool. So yes. I submitted a picture and chose an effect (zooming into my eye). The effect is Ai. Pretty cool
I am, actually a real person. 😊 that doesn’t seem to make a difference to some who disagree. Instead they attack me, not the ideas or thoughts that are different from mine. That’s a truly sad place to be and I feel sorry for them.
September 19, 2025 at 1:45 AM
I am, actually a real person. 😊 that doesn’t seem to make a difference to some who disagree. Instead they attack me, not the ideas or thoughts that are different from mine. That’s a truly sad place to be and I feel sorry for them.
Wow. The TDS has completely over taken you. I guess there’s nothing left but to put on your tin hat and go back in the echo chamber. Sad
September 19, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Wow. The TDS has completely over taken you. I guess there’s nothing left but to put on your tin hat and go back in the echo chamber. Sad
I just find it so interesting how worked up you get in a conversation with someone who has a different view. Call me all the names you want, but you’re only exposing yourself to be an unkind person who can’t be approached for a civil conversation. That’s truly sad.
September 19, 2025 at 1:42 AM
I just find it so interesting how worked up you get in a conversation with someone who has a different view. Call me all the names you want, but you’re only exposing yourself to be an unkind person who can’t be approached for a civil conversation. That’s truly sad.
ABC’s decision to remove Jimmy Kimmel from their airwaves does not, in itself, constitute a violation of the First Amendment, because the First Amendment restricts government action, not that of private entities like ABC. Liberals need to take basic civics again.
September 18, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Actually it does. The network is bound by duty to the public. Kimmel is a representative of the network. We agree that if he had made comments outside of his public facing obligation, his speech should be protected. 100%. But that’s not the case here.
September 18, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Actually it does. The network is bound by duty to the public. Kimmel is a representative of the network. We agree that if he had made comments outside of his public facing obligation, his speech should be protected. 100%. But that’s not the case here.
Nope. The point is that in Kimmel’s suggestion that the assassin was MAGA, he “misled” the American people “about a significant fact” according to FCC chair, Brendan Carr.
September 18, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Nope. The point is that in Kimmel’s suggestion that the assassin was MAGA, he “misled” the American people “about a significant fact” according to FCC chair, Brendan Carr.