but for me the solution was to privilege the individual suffering from less utility over those who might benefit from more utility but are already well-off. Weak negative utilitarianism allows us to internalize the diminishing returns of utility without rejecting utilitarian frameworks outright.

In reference to the chart you shared, I'm curious why you were drawn to egalitarianism rather than weak negative utilitarianism. I also have the same instinct you described, a bias towards the situation where both people are relatively well-off, (1/2)

she has multiple times in the past claimed to be a journalist

the regimen might be changed based on blood test results but usually in basic ways that don't necessitate an endocrinologist's input (slightly changing dosages)

negative health effects are rare and easy to identify with rudimentary blood tests through an informed consent healthcare provider. (2/2)

as someone who has helped dozens of trans women access healthcare and been through the ringer myself, this is not very true. most people start off with the same or a similar regimen of hrt (1/2)

they aren't allowed to distribute testosterone, but there's a non-profit in my city that directly gives estrogen and anti-androgens to people without a prescription, and does the bloodwork for free

it is illegal for testosterone, but doesn't seem to be for other forms of HRT

I'd add proximity to agricultural production.

and they stop tracking it in october, the data it shows is only 10/12 months

i went through my twitter follow list looked up everyone's names on bluesky to see if they had an account here, and then followed people who had good takes in the discover page after bluesky learned my interests a lil

visiting the U.S. again, or just sticking to the U.K.? either way exciting

it is only 3 letters! quite tiny

also: no u