Science is not “debunked lies”.

I genuinely appreciate that. That is more than can be said for most GC religious folks. Certainly Jimbo is not amenable to any information that threatens his religious beliefs.

I’m “lying” by stating scientific facts.

Science is real. I know it. You know it. He knows it. Everyone sensible knows it. The gender critical religion pseudoscientific religion is false. No amount of whining will ever change that fact.

Testes/ovaries and genitalia are indeed primary sex characteristics.

Haha thanks

Thanks lmao

Nothing as far as I can tell. They just told me that I violated their “Respectful Discourse”policy (which I likely did lol, I just can’t remember when)

It’s still very bad. I don’t think HRT is available for youth under 16 so they’re just gonna be forced to go through puberty of the wrong gender

You are the extremist in our party. You call yourself a democrat, yet you refer to trans women as “biological males/men”. Thats extremism. That’s straight up Nazism

Mamdani supports trans rights and you have spent the entire evening calling trans women “males” and “biological men”. Mamdani would physically kick you out of the party if he could.

Hunter Schafer is female, biologically and socially. Elliot Page is male, biologically and socially. They would agree with that statement. Why don’t you?

Chris Hayes supports trans rights and has not been shy about shutting down people like yourself.

You’ve been in an echo chamber in Twitter so long you have been radicalized.

The only time you responded to me was when you called me crazy for correcting you when you stated something wildly pseudoscientific.

No one misquoted you. No one made any assumptions about you.

The thing is, you *are* winning. The anti-trans movement has been incredibly successful.

You’ve blocked at least one trans person who engaged with you in very good faith and politely criticized you (meanwhile you called women like her “men”).

We fled here to escape people like you on Twitter. Why did you follow us here?

You didn’t give any example.

I provided you with a tonne of info and you ignored it all.

“Biological sex” doesn’t exist. It is *religious terminology*. I am a zoology student. That term is used *exclusively* by anti trans activists. It is not used in biology because it is redundant. There is no abiotic sex.

2/2 concerned about the state of your party. If you were, you’d be unequivocally condemning anti-trans pseudoscience and bigotry. Instead, you are endorsing it and further weakening the party.

You are the one asserting that sex doesn’t exist!

“Biological sex” is a religious term. Sex is definitionally biological. There is no abiotic sex, therefore there is no “biological sex” either.

You are living in a right wing echo chamber and believe in pseudoscience. You are not wildly 1/2