James Johnston
@snorkiet.bsky.social
Calling out extremism, liers, exploitation & general deceit for personal gain🤦〝Why can't we all just get along?
Be Honest & the best person you can be🤔
Be Honest & the best person you can be🤔
Yeh true, no doubt there is good journalism in there once you get over the misleading / lying headlined
What I hate is then setting a paid for agenta
What I hate is then setting a paid for agenta
December 1, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Yeh true, no doubt there is good journalism in there once you get over the misleading / lying headlined
What I hate is then setting a paid for agenta
What I hate is then setting a paid for agenta
Eh.
When 80-90% of the media is focused on rage farming for clicks?
Because thats more profitable / in their interest than doing the right thing for the country.
They are the doom loop
Most media just bad, but the sooner printed media goes to the wall the better
When 80-90% of the media is focused on rage farming for clicks?
Because thats more profitable / in their interest than doing the right thing for the country.
They are the doom loop
Most media just bad, but the sooner printed media goes to the wall the better
December 1, 2025 at 6:06 AM
Eh.
When 80-90% of the media is focused on rage farming for clicks?
Because thats more profitable / in their interest than doing the right thing for the country.
They are the doom loop
Most media just bad, but the sooner printed media goes to the wall the better
When 80-90% of the media is focused on rage farming for clicks?
Because thats more profitable / in their interest than doing the right thing for the country.
They are the doom loop
Most media just bad, but the sooner printed media goes to the wall the better
Why? Eh? The truth hurts
November 29, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Why? Eh? The truth hurts
Hmm, the assumption being that the law is applied equally to everyone. Not sure that holds in the USA at the moment
November 7, 2025 at 12:46 PM
Hmm, the assumption being that the law is applied equally to everyone. Not sure that holds in the USA at the moment
It's true, they used a time machine build using reverse engineering from crashed rozwell ufos
Either that or it's total rollocks
Either that or it's total rollocks
October 8, 2025 at 5:06 PM
It's true, they used a time machine build using reverse engineering from crashed rozwell ufos
Either that or it's total rollocks
Either that or it's total rollocks
Sack him? She backed him!
October 7, 2025 at 11:34 AM
Sack him? She backed him!
No one is above the law
October 6, 2025 at 4:40 AM
No one is above the law
Eh? Funny how people that can't make a coherent point resort to name calling and unfounded accusations
Says it all for the UK these days
Says it all for the UK these days
August 13, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Eh? Funny how people that can't make a coherent point resort to name calling and unfounded accusations
Says it all for the UK these days
Says it all for the UK these days
Far right individuals take it upoun themselves to find a hotel hosting immigrants and set fire to it because they believe something they read on social media. To them its a just cause so justified to break the law
You are ok with that?
Or is it violence?
Shoplifting OK, others get away with it?
You are ok with that?
Or is it violence?
Shoplifting OK, others get away with it?
August 13, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Far right individuals take it upoun themselves to find a hotel hosting immigrants and set fire to it because they believe something they read on social media. To them its a just cause so justified to break the law
You are ok with that?
Or is it violence?
Shoplifting OK, others get away with it?
You are ok with that?
Or is it violence?
Shoplifting OK, others get away with it?
Yeh it is breaking the law,... until it isn't
Which is exactly what PA are doing via the judicial review
Participants of Civil disobedience do so in full law knowledge and accept the consequences for their cause but they break the law neve the less
Oh and the Franco comparison 🤣
Which is exactly what PA are doing via the judicial review
Participants of Civil disobedience do so in full law knowledge and accept the consequences for their cause but they break the law neve the less
Oh and the Franco comparison 🤣
August 13, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Yeh it is breaking the law,... until it isn't
Which is exactly what PA are doing via the judicial review
Participants of Civil disobedience do so in full law knowledge and accept the consequences for their cause but they break the law neve the less
Oh and the Franco comparison 🤣
Which is exactly what PA are doing via the judicial review
Participants of Civil disobedience do so in full law knowledge and accept the consequences for their cause but they break the law neve the less
Oh and the Franco comparison 🤣
Yes, I applaude it for the right cause. Regardless break the law get arrested, full stop. So, is PA a just cause, I don't know. It's spate from the palistinian cause
“Nonviolence is the weapon of the strong. When we fight, we must be prepared to die or to be imprisoned.”
“Nonviolence is the weapon of the strong. When we fight, we must be prepared to die or to be imprisoned.”
August 12, 2025 at 6:28 AM
Yes, I applaude it for the right cause. Regardless break the law get arrested, full stop. So, is PA a just cause, I don't know. It's spate from the palistinian cause
“Nonviolence is the weapon of the strong. When we fight, we must be prepared to die or to be imprisoned.”
“Nonviolence is the weapon of the strong. When we fight, we must be prepared to die or to be imprisoned.”
So not pro Hamas, good
Your non violent analogy makes no sense
Most crimes are non violent
Your non violent analogy makes no sense
Most crimes are non violent
August 12, 2025 at 3:31 AM
So not pro Hamas, good
Your non violent analogy makes no sense
Most crimes are non violent
Your non violent analogy makes no sense
Most crimes are non violent
You equate your cause to gandi but won't call out terrorists orgs that commit heinous crimes. You avoided that, twice now.
jeeze you really don't believe in the rule of law
An end justified the means person.
jeeze you really don't believe in the rule of law
An end justified the means person.
August 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM
You equate your cause to gandi but won't call out terrorists orgs that commit heinous crimes. You avoided that, twice now.
jeeze you really don't believe in the rule of law
An end justified the means person.
jeeze you really don't believe in the rule of law
An end justified the means person.
White supremacy? Jeez
Are you a zealot who can't talk to anyone with differing opinions without resorting to unfounded name calling and lies
Are you a zealot who can't talk to anyone with differing opinions without resorting to unfounded name calling and lies
August 11, 2025 at 5:05 PM
White supremacy? Jeez
Are you a zealot who can't talk to anyone with differing opinions without resorting to unfounded name calling and lies
Are you a zealot who can't talk to anyone with differing opinions without resorting to unfounded name calling and lies
Yeh Just not true, but then didn't expect anything else.
August 11, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Yeh Just not true, but then didn't expect anything else.
Indeed, I notice you didn't refute Hamas as an example or decry them
Would you be against a pro Hamas march in the UK?
Hmm now I'm thinking your ideology is more sinister than just ignoring the laws of the land
🤔
Would you be against a pro Hamas march in the UK?
Hmm now I'm thinking your ideology is more sinister than just ignoring the laws of the land
🤔
August 11, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Indeed, I notice you didn't refute Hamas as an example or decry them
Would you be against a pro Hamas march in the UK?
Hmm now I'm thinking your ideology is more sinister than just ignoring the laws of the land
🤔
Would you be against a pro Hamas march in the UK?
Hmm now I'm thinking your ideology is more sinister than just ignoring the laws of the land
🤔
Im not disputing a just cause. Nelson Mandela is an interesting example given by any definition he was a terrorist. That history now regards him a freedom fighter and statesman?
From 2025 apartheid is horrendous. In the 60s it wasn't regarded as such. Passage of history changed that perception
From 2025 apartheid is horrendous. In the 60s it wasn't regarded as such. Passage of history changed that perception
August 11, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Im not disputing a just cause. Nelson Mandela is an interesting example given by any definition he was a terrorist. That history now regards him a freedom fighter and statesman?
From 2025 apartheid is horrendous. In the 60s it wasn't regarded as such. Passage of history changed that perception
From 2025 apartheid is horrendous. In the 60s it wasn't regarded as such. Passage of history changed that perception
Any terrorist organisation, Hamas?
It's very sad when people think the law doesn't apply to them because of their ideology.
Unlike you, most of the people knew that arrest was a high risk and did it anyway. They did this for their cause, not because of lame excuses. I respect that.
It's very sad when people think the law doesn't apply to them because of their ideology.
Unlike you, most of the people knew that arrest was a high risk and did it anyway. They did this for their cause, not because of lame excuses. I respect that.
August 11, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Any terrorist organisation, Hamas?
It's very sad when people think the law doesn't apply to them because of their ideology.
Unlike you, most of the people knew that arrest was a high risk and did it anyway. They did this for their cause, not because of lame excuses. I respect that.
It's very sad when people think the law doesn't apply to them because of their ideology.
Unlike you, most of the people knew that arrest was a high risk and did it anyway. They did this for their cause, not because of lame excuses. I respect that.
Indeed, not all anologous but I take point
You picked those that were seen to be right by the judgement of history
I could pick others that didn't last the test of time
What is true here, now, the rule of law stands. Support a terrorist org expect to get arrested
You cant choose what laws to obey
You picked those that were seen to be right by the judgement of history
I could pick others that didn't last the test of time
What is true here, now, the rule of law stands. Support a terrorist org expect to get arrested
You cant choose what laws to obey
August 11, 2025 at 10:06 AM
Indeed, not all anologous but I take point
You picked those that were seen to be right by the judgement of history
I could pick others that didn't last the test of time
What is true here, now, the rule of law stands. Support a terrorist org expect to get arrested
You cant choose what laws to obey
You picked those that were seen to be right by the judgement of history
I could pick others that didn't last the test of time
What is true here, now, the rule of law stands. Support a terrorist org expect to get arrested
You cant choose what laws to obey