Part 1: (576.9µs @ 1597 samples)
Part 2: (421.0µs @ 2262 samples)
Total (Run): 1.00ms
----
part2 is similar to part1, using function pointer is more efficient.
Part 1: (576.9µs @ 1597 samples)
Part 2: (421.0µs @ 2262 samples)
Total (Run): 1.00ms
----
part2 is similar to part1, using function pointer is more efficient.
Part 1: (62.3ms @ 15 samples)
Part 2: (10.8ms @ 92 samples)
Total (Run): 73.10ms
----
hints: sum of arithmetic sequence
Part 1: (62.3ms @ 15 samples)
Part 2: (10.8ms @ 92 samples)
Total (Run): 73.10ms
----
hints: sum of arithmetic sequence
using u64 instead of u32 😂
using u64 instead of u32 😂
Part 1: (2.3ms @ 428 samples)
Part 2: (49.8µs @ 10000 samples)
Total (Run): 2.35ms
Part 1: (2.3ms @ 428 samples)
Part 2: (49.8µs @ 10000 samples)
Total (Run): 2.35ms