@smay52.bsky.social
I'm sorry but all his other stuff sure he's just asking the question, spit balling ideas. But satellite streaks being probes launched? He's actually lost the plot @deschscoveries.bsky.social
November 22, 2025 at 7:53 AM
I'm sorry but all his other stuff sure he's just asking the question, spit balling ideas. But satellite streaks being probes launched? He's actually lost the plot @deschscoveries.bsky.social
My man, Tim Burchett is a known crack pot, just because he's a representative doesn't mean he knows more than you or I. You need to stop searching for things that tick off your anxiety.
November 21, 2025 at 11:25 AM
My man, Tim Burchett is a known crack pot, just because he's a representative doesn't mean he knows more than you or I. You need to stop searching for things that tick off your anxiety.
Really enjoyed the stream by NASA was informative but not too technical.
November 20, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Really enjoyed the stream by NASA was informative but not too technical.
Please stay off reddit especially that sub reddit. Of course these presenters are nervous in front of a camera, they didn't study journalism they study astronomy they probably never expected to be put in front of a camera. Please remember NASA is not the only space agency.
November 20, 2025 at 12:27 AM
Please stay off reddit especially that sub reddit. Of course these presenters are nervous in front of a camera, they didn't study journalism they study astronomy they probably never expected to be put in front of a camera. Please remember NASA is not the only space agency.
Really enjoyed the broadcast by NASA, as someone without technical expertise in Astronomy I didn't feel bombarded with technical analysis and left feeling well informed.
November 20, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Really enjoyed the broadcast by NASA, as someone without technical expertise in Astronomy I didn't feel bombarded with technical analysis and left feeling well informed.
Gotta remember l, this comet is on it way out, has not changed trajectory at all. If it were hostile something would have happened by now.
November 19, 2025 at 3:32 AM
Gotta remember l, this comet is on it way out, has not changed trajectory at all. If it were hostile something would have happened by now.
Can't claim they are edited when amateurs and agencies have both taken images
November 19, 2025 at 3:23 AM
Can't claim they are edited when amateurs and agencies have both taken images
Queue the Avi Loeb rant about K1 in roughly 3 days.
November 19, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Queue the Avi Loeb rant about K1 in roughly 3 days.
Excited for NASA release tomorrow, also very excited for the response from the crack pots when they all sigh in disappointment that NASA wasn't hiding the images, they simply didn't have the staff to do it.
November 19, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Excited for NASA release tomorrow, also very excited for the response from the crack pots when they all sigh in disappointment that NASA wasn't hiding the images, they simply didn't have the staff to do it.
Plus it did not move faster, it maintained is speed of 68km/s as predicted months before hand. Please just stop, your just digging a bigger hole.
November 18, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Plus it did not move faster, it maintained is speed of 68km/s as predicted months before hand. Please just stop, your just digging a bigger hole.
The non gravitional thrust was due to emissions, happens with every comet. Please take a look at the JPL data it will show you the thrust was actually smaller than most comets at perillion.
November 18, 2025 at 9:46 PM
The non gravitional thrust was due to emissions, happens with every comet. Please take a look at the JPL data it will show you the thrust was actually smaller than most comets at perillion.
Were a spaceship and used so called thrusters ho would our models have predicted it's exact trajectory which has not changed? If it thrusted why is it still on that trajectory. Please stop using Google AI for your research, it's not peer reviewed and just pulls randomly for latest articles.
November 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Were a spaceship and used so called thrusters ho would our models have predicted it's exact trajectory which has not changed? If it thrusted why is it still on that trajectory. Please stop using Google AI for your research, it's not peer reviewed and just pulls randomly for latest articles.
The Google screenshot straight up contradicts your argument. For most comets yes unlikely as they form in our solar system. 3i formed in a completely different stad system with a completely different composition, hence the different chemicals and emissions. Just use common sense for a moment, if it
November 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM
The Google screenshot straight up contradicts your argument. For most comets yes unlikely as they form in our solar system. 3i formed in a completely different stad system with a completely different composition, hence the different chemicals and emissions. Just use common sense for a moment, if it
Exactly, I'm not trying to have a dog at the guy, but using Google's AI as a research tool is irresponsible. His entire claims is our the window, if 3i has thrusted then why is it still on its plotted trajectory with no deviations? Case Closed it's a comet.
November 18, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Exactly, I'm not trying to have a dog at the guy, but using Google's AI as a research tool is irresponsible. His entire claims is our the window, if 3i has thrusted then why is it still on its plotted trajectory with no deviations? Case Closed it's a comet.
Just stop listening to Loeb, his comments on that post are so ironic it's laughable. He claims mainstream science won't admit errors. Still l waiting for lunch be to admit his errors from months ago.
November 18, 2025 at 4:03 AM
Just stop listening to Loeb, his comments on that post are so ironic it's laughable. He claims mainstream science won't admit errors. Still l waiting for lunch be to admit his errors from months ago.
You clearly did not ready anything if you think Loebs size estimates are legitimate. Your main argument that it's anti tail is evidence of thrust at perillion is baseless. 3i had an anti tail months before as far back as August. This isn't a dig at you, it's simply asking you do research.
November 18, 2025 at 3:59 AM
You clearly did not ready anything if you think Loebs size estimates are legitimate. Your main argument that it's anti tail is evidence of thrust at perillion is baseless. 3i had an anti tail months before as far back as August. This isn't a dig at you, it's simply asking you do research.
You also simply ignored evidence I gave you. Stop fear mongering.
November 18, 2025 at 3:31 AM
You also simply ignored evidence I gave you. Stop fear mongering.
November 18, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Incorrect, the tail was present months before photographed by the gemini South observatory.
November 18, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Incorrect, the tail was present months before photographed by the gemini South observatory.
Let them, it's the crack pots last resort.
November 17, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Let them, it's the crack pots last resort.