Drew Jones
@skiptotheend.bsky.social
World's leading Dunning-Kruger expert.
Vaccinating myself against this by injecting them all directly into my eyeballs.
November 22, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Vaccinating myself against this by injecting them all directly into my eyeballs.
"Why are you denying my experience." Said the GC frog to the GC scorpion.
November 22, 2025 at 1:00 PM
"Why are you denying my experience." Said the GC frog to the GC scorpion.
It's 'coming over here, taking our jobs' all over again.
November 22, 2025 at 3:23 AM
It's 'coming over here, taking our jobs' all over again.
Also the first time drink ever managed a drink at the World Cup.
November 19, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Also the first time drink ever managed a drink at the World Cup.
'Can you design us an English pub sign?'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
November 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM
'Can you design us an English pub sign?'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
Peter Thetankengine Thompson.
November 17, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Peter Thetankengine Thompson.
You can have first-hand, inside knowledge of the workings of Tavistock or the BBC. If you think you have both you're overestimating your powers of insight and have an insatiable need for media validation.
November 15, 2025 at 9:52 PM
You can have first-hand, inside knowledge of the workings of Tavistock or the BBC. If you think you have both you're overestimating your powers of insight and have an insatiable need for media validation.
Again, no. Linking the highest and lowest pay is not a glass ceiling. The top end can go as high it's financially viable to take everyone else with them. After all it's the same organisation, same profit.
November 7, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Again, no. Linking the highest and lowest pay is not a glass ceiling. The top end can go as high it's financially viable to take everyone else with them. After all it's the same organisation, same profit.
You keep referring to monkeys and peanuts without considering how many people perform, high-risk/important jobs well without being compensated anywhere near £500k. The idea that CEOs are rarified and must be paid hundreds of times what they expect any 'normal' person does is indefensible.
November 6, 2025 at 11:47 PM
You keep referring to monkeys and peanuts without considering how many people perform, high-risk/important jobs well without being compensated anywhere near £500k. The idea that CEOs are rarified and must be paid hundreds of times what they expect any 'normal' person does is indefensible.
Again, no one is saying checkout staff would be on £450k. We're saying CEO pay being 360x minimum wage has been normalised but is not ethical or justifiable without projecting ridiculous scenarios onto the conversation.
November 6, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Again, no one is saying checkout staff would be on £450k. We're saying CEO pay being 360x minimum wage has been normalised but is not ethical or justifiable without projecting ridiculous scenarios onto the conversation.
No one is saying it's an accident. He took over the running of an already successful national supermarket. He and other CEOs should have the biggest paycheck in the company, just not one so massively out of range of the other people contributing to the £70bn.
November 6, 2025 at 8:55 PM
No one is saying it's an accident. He took over the running of an already successful national supermarket. He and other CEOs should have the biggest paycheck in the company, just not one so massively out of range of the other people contributing to the £70bn.
Sure, that's how hierarchies work but he would have planned little and implemented none which is why he would be paid the most but should not be credited with the whole £70bn.
November 6, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Sure, that's how hierarchies work but he would have planned little and implemented none which is why he would be paid the most but should not be credited with the whole £70bn.
Did he alone generate 70bn or was it the whole Tesco workforce?
November 6, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Did he alone generate 70bn or was it the whole Tesco workforce?
Nope. There is no credit in making the right choice in taking an action almost everyone else does. Only shame and condemnation for those that don't.
November 3, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Nope. There is no credit in making the right choice in taking an action almost everyone else does. Only shame and condemnation for those that don't.
She deserves as much credit for this as she does for observing the rules prohibiting murder. It shouldn't be a choice available to the ultra wealthy.
November 3, 2025 at 12:17 PM
She deserves as much credit for this as she does for observing the rules prohibiting murder. It shouldn't be a choice available to the ultra wealthy.
The Maya effect: like the Mandela effect, where you might remember things differently but it always is and was exactly how Maya Forstater wants it to be.
November 3, 2025 at 10:25 AM
The Maya effect: like the Mandela effect, where you might remember things differently but it always is and was exactly how Maya Forstater wants it to be.
I'm begging of you, please don't take my ham
November 1, 2025 at 4:02 PM
I'm begging of you, please don't take my ham
There's only 2 more months this year, they'll be announcing the presentation soon.
November 1, 2025 at 10:55 AM
There's only 2 more months this year, they'll be announcing the presentation soon.
You can buy women's astroturfing groups but you can't buy women.
October 31, 2025 at 8:51 PM
You can buy women's astroturfing groups but you can't buy women.
Even if someone did reverse engineer the bad argument, it is still a bad argument so how does that undermine the criticism of the original bad argument?
October 28, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Even if someone did reverse engineer the bad argument, it is still a bad argument so how does that undermine the criticism of the original bad argument?
This is so unself-aware they should try it. No trans people were involved in SC so it's all on them, no way can they tell it without exposing the funding and astroturfing or needing so much exposition to explain their jargon and conspiracy theories that it would completely unravel their narrative.
October 21, 2025 at 10:27 AM
This is so unself-aware they should try it. No trans people were involved in SC so it's all on them, no way can they tell it without exposing the funding and astroturfing or needing so much exposition to explain their jargon and conspiracy theories that it would completely unravel their narrative.