Universeness
@skelly131.bsky.social
Scottish, Retired, Computer Science teacher.
Is everyone who is not a clone of YOU, a medical anomaly?
Are all people who don't fit into your backwards and primitive notion of 'sex' categorization, a medical anomaly?
Learn! Do better! You don't have to be a pedestrian thinker all of your life! Sex is a spectrum. Ffs LEARN!
Are all people who don't fit into your backwards and primitive notion of 'sex' categorization, a medical anomaly?
Learn! Do better! You don't have to be a pedestrian thinker all of your life! Sex is a spectrum. Ffs LEARN!
November 14, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Is everyone who is not a clone of YOU, a medical anomaly?
Are all people who don't fit into your backwards and primitive notion of 'sex' categorization, a medical anomaly?
Learn! Do better! You don't have to be a pedestrian thinker all of your life! Sex is a spectrum. Ffs LEARN!
Are all people who don't fit into your backwards and primitive notion of 'sex' categorization, a medical anomaly?
Learn! Do better! You don't have to be a pedestrian thinker all of your life! Sex is a spectrum. Ffs LEARN!
Try to catch up auld yin. Modern biology has surpassed your regressive thinking. Learn! Do better! Educate yourself!
Sex is a spectrum.
Sex is a spectrum.
November 14, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Try to catch up auld yin. Modern biology has surpassed your regressive thinking. Learn! Do better! Educate yourself!
Sex is a spectrum.
Sex is a spectrum.
Well done Sherlock! You figured it out, all by yourself, that when people and modern biologists use the term intersex, they are stating that sex is not a binary but is a spectrum. The common label 'non-binary,' is also used. Do you now understand that one too?
November 14, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Well done Sherlock! You figured it out, all by yourself, that when people and modern biologists use the term intersex, they are stating that sex is not a binary but is a spectrum. The common label 'non-binary,' is also used. Do you now understand that one too?
Just your used toilet paper quack boy.
That's all you have offered on this thread!
It's only you who likes the resultant stink!
That's all you have offered on this thread!
It's only you who likes the resultant stink!
November 13, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Just your used toilet paper quack boy.
That's all you have offered on this thread!
It's only you who likes the resultant stink!
That's all you have offered on this thread!
It's only you who likes the resultant stink!
Oh, what a surprise, another bullshit false claim from quack boy! You have already demonstrated ad nauseam, your bigoted, biased, and backwards viewpoints regarding sexually non-binary people. Do you have to keep displaying your mental schisms and science-denial as masking a cry for help?
November 13, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Oh, what a surprise, another bullshit false claim from quack boy! You have already demonstrated ad nauseam, your bigoted, biased, and backwards viewpoints regarding sexually non-binary people. Do you have to keep displaying your mental schisms and science-denial as masking a cry for help?
... himself, when others expect him to do his own homework!
November 13, 2025 at 11:03 AM
... himself, when others expect him to do his own homework!
Looks like @quackometer.bsky.social (a.k.a quack boy)could not find one MODERN, peer-reviewed, published science paper from MODERN biologists, from say the last 10 years that does not categorise some folks as intersex based on the data gathered. Quack boy has always squirmed, squelched and soiled
November 13, 2025 at 11:03 AM
Looks like @quackometer.bsky.social (a.k.a quack boy)could not find one MODERN, peer-reviewed, published science paper from MODERN biologists, from say the last 10 years that does not categorise some folks as intersex based on the data gathered. Quack boy has always squirmed, squelched and soiled
You provide one for the past 10 years that only uses the categories male and female quack boy!
November 12, 2025 at 3:50 PM
You provide one for the past 10 years that only uses the categories male and female quack boy!
Also, you can throw quack boys shit, right back at him. Let him prove that all peer reviewed MODERN biological studies about human sex categorisation records their ‘data’ exclusively under ‘male’ or ‘female’ and NEVER include data under labels such as ‘Intersex.’
How about from the past 10 years?
How about from the past 10 years?
November 12, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Also, you can throw quack boys shit, right back at him. Let him prove that all peer reviewed MODERN biological studies about human sex categorisation records their ‘data’ exclusively under ‘male’ or ‘female’ and NEVER include data under labels such as ‘Intersex.’
How about from the past 10 years?
How about from the past 10 years?
Unfortunately, that does not do much to reduce his negative impact on trans people and trans rights, as he helps bolster the misinformed science deniers who still insist sex is a binary.
November 11, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Unfortunately, that does not do much to reduce his negative impact on trans people and trans rights, as he helps bolster the misinformed science deniers who still insist sex is a binary.
Unfortunately not. Richard Dawkins, for example, is one of the best combatants against theism that there has ever been imo. He is also a well-respected biologist, but he insists that sex is a binary. He is wrong!
November 11, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Unfortunately not. Richard Dawkins, for example, is one of the best combatants against theism that there has ever been imo. He is also a well-respected biologist, but he insists that sex is a binary. He is wrong!
that such is true, due to their own, often misplaced (again only imo) loyalty to one side or the other. I for example assign zero credence to the proposal that the attack on the twin towers in New York, was committed by the American secret service agencies. How about you?
November 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM
that such is true, due to their own, often misplaced (again only imo) loyalty to one side or the other. I for example assign zero credence to the proposal that the attack on the twin towers in New York, was committed by the American secret service agencies. How about you?
opportunity to blame an enemy for an atrocity and start a war they wanted to start. BUT I think its rather irrational to believe conspiracies that claim such intrigues are true, without very strong evidence. People who jump enthusiastically towards such conspiracy theories, normally WANT to believe
November 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM
opportunity to blame an enemy for an atrocity and start a war they wanted to start. BUT I think its rather irrational to believe conspiracies that claim such intrigues are true, without very strong evidence. People who jump enthusiastically towards such conspiracy theories, normally WANT to believe
For me, it's like suggesting that most of the victims of the IRA were actually killed by British soldiers or that most of the victims of the UDA or UFF were actually killed by the IRA. I don't deny that there have been occasions when a malignant force is willing to kill some of their own for the
November 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM
For me, it's like suggesting that most of the victims of the IRA were actually killed by British soldiers or that most of the victims of the UDA or UFF were actually killed by the IRA. I don't deny that there have been occasions when a malignant force is willing to kill some of their own for the
Anecdotal at best, absolute nonsense at worse. In the final analysis, Israel failed to learn that the answer to atrocity is NEVER EVER EVER an even worse atrocity like the genocide in Gaza!
November 3, 2025 at 10:38 PM
Anecdotal at best, absolute nonsense at worse. In the final analysis, Israel failed to learn that the answer to atrocity is NEVER EVER EVER an even worse atrocity like the genocide in Gaza!
You would need to provide strong evidence to support a claim that most of the Israeli victims killed in the Hamas attack of Oct 7th were killed by other Israelis. I currently find such a claim to be ridiculous.
November 3, 2025 at 5:54 PM
You would need to provide strong evidence to support a claim that most of the Israeli victims killed in the Hamas attack of Oct 7th were killed by other Israelis. I currently find such a claim to be ridiculous.
that position to one in which they have become, by far, the most hated state on this planet. They have lifted the Palestinian cause high above their own.
November 3, 2025 at 9:07 AM
that position to one in which they have become, by far, the most hated state on this planet. They have lifted the Palestinian cause high above their own.
Perhaps they will never recover for as long as their now infected state and flag exists. Sadly imo, their shame will also stain every member of their global diaspora in many different ways. After the atrocity Hamas committed on Oct 7th, Israel held the moral high ground and they managed to change ..
November 3, 2025 at 9:07 AM
Perhaps they will never recover for as long as their now infected state and flag exists. Sadly imo, their shame will also stain every member of their global diaspora in many different ways. After the atrocity Hamas committed on Oct 7th, Israel held the moral high ground and they managed to change ..
Israel has soiled itself in a horrific mockery of its own history. It has shamed the Jewish victims of the Holocaust during WW II by demonstrating that most of its people have mindsets that Adolf Hitler would have been proud of. Israel will not recover from their utter shame for a hundred years, …
November 3, 2025 at 9:07 AM
Israel has soiled itself in a horrific mockery of its own history. It has shamed the Jewish victims of the Holocaust during WW II by demonstrating that most of its people have mindsets that Adolf Hitler would have been proud of. Israel will not recover from their utter shame for a hundred years, …
I appreciate the offer, but your 'some would cover what you say,' will suffice for now.
October 29, 2025 at 4:10 PM
I appreciate the offer, but your 'some would cover what you say,' will suffice for now.
I was glad @heavensgone.bsky.social,
That you ‘liked’ the first two response sections I made to your op and you did not ‘like’ the 3rd. Can I assume that this means that you don’t find my opinions on land ownership, ‘out there’ or ‘fringe?’
What is the policy of the Greens on land ownership?
That you ‘liked’ the first two response sections I made to your op and you did not ‘like’ the 3rd. Can I assume that this means that you don’t find my opinions on land ownership, ‘out there’ or ‘fringe?’
What is the policy of the Greens on land ownership?
October 29, 2025 at 10:36 AM
I was glad @heavensgone.bsky.social,
That you ‘liked’ the first two response sections I made to your op and you did not ‘like’ the 3rd. Can I assume that this means that you don’t find my opinions on land ownership, ‘out there’ or ‘fringe?’
What is the policy of the Greens on land ownership?
That you ‘liked’ the first two response sections I made to your op and you did not ‘like’ the 3rd. Can I assume that this means that you don’t find my opinions on land ownership, ‘out there’ or ‘fringe?’
What is the policy of the Greens on land ownership?
authority would of course, enforce the stewardship of ‘national,’ land but all land should not even be ‘owned’ by any notion of sovereign or national government. I realise my opinion here is ‘out there’ and ‘very fringe,’ but I DO really think that this is the progressive way we humans should go!
October 29, 2025 at 8:56 AM
authority would of course, enforce the stewardship of ‘national,’ land but all land should not even be ‘owned’ by any notion of sovereign or national government. I realise my opinion here is ‘out there’ and ‘very fringe,’ but I DO really think that this is the progressive way we humans should go!
commercial building on that land etc, then sure, no one else should be able to ‘trespass’ or utilise that area or a ‘sensible’ surrounding area, without your consent. BUT the land that property occupies, must remain in common ownership/stewardship of all life that exists on this planet imo. Local
October 29, 2025 at 8:56 AM
commercial building on that land etc, then sure, no one else should be able to ‘trespass’ or utilise that area or a ‘sensible’ surrounding area, without your consent. BUT the land that property occupies, must remain in common ownership/stewardship of all life that exists on this planet imo. Local