Argh, ja. Social Media nachts um 1.

Trippy!

Meinst du damit SteamOS zum selbst installieren?

help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view...

I have a friend that got a reprimand at his consulting company for shooting down a client project that was a total mistake.

His boss reminded him that he's just the person to point to "but it has external review" in case it goes down the drain.

He quit and is now a tech team lead.

I'm very confused by that. Bond being retold all over all the times and never being a coherent character in a coherent timeline was already a given?

So yeah, someone told a story about his death? So what?

I hate how modern storytelling doesn't want to be... just that.

Also, people who work on something as complex as programming languages know that they rarely have the chance to design things twice. So they appreciate interaction with others tackling the same problem quite much.

I'm so super annoyed that because some 2 folks butted heads a few years ago, it's framed as a project war.

_NONE_ of the people I was on core with have a negative opinion on Zig. My interactions with C++ folks were always stellar.

But people want to frame an outrage.

Tacos are war. Every true metalhead knows that.

🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸
🌸 No, not even to make fun of them 🌸
🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸

I've read a German newspaper describe that as a "China playing a secret card" and nearly wrote a letter to the editor. That was neither a secret nor has there been no one who highlighted it.

China holds the refinement capacity. So even if you mine it somewhere else, its chain usually goes through china.

Exactly, but somehow, the burden is on us on *checks notes* yocto.

I mean, I would be fine with a conversation, but not with a shouting match.

Don't you have a June oven around for that?

Thought leadership?

I personally like the reboot they've done after the ill-received beta. Happy to see it come out later this year.

Also, any solution you pick, you'll stay with forever.

2 thoughts:
* Performance-wise: I'm mostly in situations where performance-wise e.g. replacing `String::clone` is optimised be replaced by `Arc::clone`. Slower is rarely the issue.
* Teaching-wise: I have a lot of "a thing with Handle behaviour often implements Clone". Handle makes that easier.

Sameish camp, but "T: Clone" lets you sneak in a lot of stuff, "T: Handle" with some stricter semantics can clarify things. Though, I've yet to see practical issues in the wild that wouldn't be considered an honest bug (e.g. by using a non-optimal cloning approach).

I wish it where T: 'owned, but that boat has sailed.