Thank you!

Thank you! And thank you for reading!

I think truly that USL and its new Pro/Rel structure will offer the fans better competition than MLS. Owners look at MLS as a better investment as it guarantees a return even if you’re a mid-table team who never wins a trophy.

I don’t disagree, i’ve been very vocal about my support of staying in the USL. I feel the league does a much better job of growing the sport for the better in this country based on merit rather than money.

The assumption was today was about USL and its new Division One league.

But when you look at the details:
- Configurable capacity to 15k for USL
- Expandable to 20k for MLS
- Ownership courting more investment

…it’s clear: Sacramento is still building with MLS in mind.

The price tag? $217M total — fully privately financed. No taxpayer burden, no city subsidies. Exactly the kind of stability and commitment MLS looks for.

The stadium was announced as 12,000 seats with a Phase 2 expansion to 20,000.

But it’s designed to be reconfigured to 15,000 — enough to meet USL Division One standards without expansion.

That leaves the 20,000-seat expansion option untouched… maybe reserved for a future MLS push.

Wilton Rancheria’s majority stake was historic as the first Native American nation to lead a men’s pro sports team.

What wasn’t highlighted: they’ve been speaking with other California tribes about joining as investors — if MLS becomes a reality.