LightNews LightNews
sirgiraffe.bsky.social
@sirgiraffe.bsky.social
54 followers 69 following 2 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
jessicahuseman.bsky.social
Anyway here's the piece. Follow @votebeat.org. www.votebeat.org/texas/2025/0...
Trump administration is now after Texas for access to its voter roll
The Justice Department is also asking the state for a list of state and local election officials responsible for voter list maintenance since November 2022.
www.votebeat.org
August 14, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Reposted
annabower.bsky.social
“What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?”

I don’t even know where to begin.

You just have to read these two pages.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case 5:24-cv-00625-JSM-PRL Document 100 Q Exhibit 30 -- A She was upset. She was jealous. Exhibit 30 is your response to her; can you read that out loud to me? "Hey, Marjorie. Remember when you destroyed your family so you could have sex with a Zangief cosplayer? Tell me again how you and the Arby's in 2000 0337 your pants" -- yeah. That was widely reported. I 2 3 mean, that's why she got divorced. And that divorce records -- Q No. No. Read the tweet. A "Are representatives of the GOP. You couldn't even run your own family. Don't tell me how to run my free speech." 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0338 Okay. So when you -- A But you're not showing the -- the screenshot. It's like intentionally blurred out. I don't know why you blurred it out. But it showed a document where somebody who she had an affair with showed text messages of her having an affair, and it was well-documented. It was in text messages. And it's the reason why she ended up getting divorced from her husband, Perry, who I know. 'Cause when -- at the time, during my campaign, they were married, and they came to my event. And it's well-known. And she's even admitted to it that they got divorced because of her marital infidelity. So -- • Right. Can you explain to me what it means -- Filed 07/31/25 Page 152 of 228 PagelD A But I don't understand why you blurred it out. It's blurred out. 3 4 Q Can you explain -- MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q Can you explain to me what it means to say 7 to her that "the Arby's in her pants"? A Well, Arby's -- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 0339 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q Answer the question. A Arby's sells roast beef. Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"? Well, it's just a -- an expression. Q What is the expression trying to convey? It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission. Q Because she had roast beef in her pants? … 1| case 5.24-Cv-Os inGeM-PRL Document 2001 saying she put Arby's in her pants? 2 A I'm saying she literally -- it's so 3 ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in 4 her pants. Yes. MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q You're not making a slur about her? 8 A No. 9 You're literally saying she put an Arby's 101 sandwich in her pants; is that right? 11 A Yes. That's correct. That's correct. 12 Why are you laughing? 13 Because I just think it's so funny. 14 Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's 15 in her pants? 16 A I just think it's so funny. I just think 17 it's so funny. 18 Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's 19 in her pants? 20 A She carries roast beef in her pockets. 21 What is your basis for saying she puts roast 22 beef in her pockets and in her pants? 0340 1 2 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment. 3 THE WITNESS: Because I know she likes 4 roast beef. 5 BY MS. BOLGER: 6 Q So what is your basis for saying she had 7 Arby's in her pants? 8 A Because I know she likes to eat at Arby's. 9 Q And she likes to put it in her pants; you 10 know that? 11 Yeah. 12 She puts Arby's in her pants? 13 Yeah. She does. 14 Q 15 Okay. If I ask Marjorie Taylor Greene, she would tell you that she puts Arby's in her pants? 16 A I -- it's my best belief that she would tell 17 you that. Yes. 18 Q Okay. Are you making a derogatory comment 19 about her sex life by talking about Arby's in her 20 pants? 21 22 A No. I'm talking about Arby's, the sandwiches. I'm talking about Arby's. I would -- I'm 0341 3 8 a very direct person. If I was making a derogatory comment, I would have said it. I just think it's so funny because I -- I feel like you would understand it if you actually hadn't blurred the photo, but it's blurred. Q We didn't blur a photo. There may be have been some kind of copy editor, but we'll get you a better copy of it, if that's right. Filed 07/31/25 Page 153 of 228 PagelD
August 12, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Reposted
annabower.bsky.social
COUNSEL: Now, be the First Amendment warrior you claim to be and admit that you were saying that the vice president of the United States had an infested vagina…

LOOMER: This is coercion…

COUNSEL: Coward.

LOOMER: Not a coward.

COUNSEL: Coward.

LOOMER: Not a coward.
Q You wrote -- stop talking. You wrote a 20 tweet that says that Kamala Harris had an "infested 21 snatch." Now, be the First Amendment warrior you 22 0373 claim to be and admit that you were saying that the vice president of the United States had an infested 2 vagina. Admit it. Because that's what you were 3 doing, and everybody knows it. MR. KLAYMAN: Let's say it. 5 THE WITNESS: This is coercion. You 6 just told me to stop talking. I'm not going to talk 7 I'm not going to be coerced. You're -- you're asking 8 me to say something -- 9 BY MS. BOLGER: 10 Q God. You're a coward 11 A -- that isn't true. I'm not a coward. 12 13 Q You're a coward; you won't even admit to what you did. 14 A I'm not a coward. I'm just not going to 15 be -- 16 Q Ms. First Amendment warrior won't admit it. 17 A -- coerced. 18 19 what? MR. KLAYMAN: Yeah. Well, you know 20 BY MS. BOLGER: 21 You won't admit it. 22 MR. KLAYMAN: You know, you're an 0374 1 officer of the court, and you behaving -- 2 THE WITNESS: I'm not going to -- 3 MS. BOLGER: Coward. 4 MR. KLAYMAN: -- in unethical fashion 5 by badgering her -- 7367930_unsynchronized.txt[7/29/25, 12:28:40 PM] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Case 5:24-cv-00625-JSM-PRL Document 100 Filed 07/31/25 Page MS. BOLGER: Cowards. 2016 MR. KLAYMAN: -- when something has nothing to do with this case. THE WITNESS: Not a coward MS. BOLGER: Coward THE WITNESS: Not a coward. It's politically motivated -- MS. BOLGER: What exhibit are we at?
August 13, 2025 at 12:32 AM