Simon Mair
banner
simonmair.bsky.social
Simon Mair
@simonmair.bsky.social
Trying to think and do economics differently. Paid labour: Academic Ecological Economist, teaching and research in systems thinking, productivity, value, postgrowth. Unpaid labour: mostly parenting. Cross cutting: screaming into the void.
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
You can red the full description here: esee2026ghent.be/wp-content/u... and please message or email me if you want help developing an abstract or more details!
esee2026ghent.be
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
This could include, but is not limited to:
1) the application of methods to historical and archaeological data;
2) use of ecological economic methods to analyse present day household or commons based provisioning;
3) development of tools to analyse fictional economies.
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
We are particularly interested in methodological reflection and development, either through the extension of existing ecological economic methods to non-capitalist contexts, or development of broader methods to expand the scope of ecological economic analysis of non-capitalist economic activity
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
This includes feminist analyses of households, anthropological explorations of commons activity, modelling of eco-socialist systems, and deep historical or archaeological work from past societies.
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
In this track we're looking for work that builds on the traditions in Ecological Economics that have a broad conception of what the economy is and can be.
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
This is not to say that there is no role for complex models. Our next step in WISE is to add complexity. We're working to extend the analysis of productivity, & this workshop identified shared themes to focus an integrated model. But this is only possible because we have the simpler models.
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Interpretation is key to understanding how to make change. No model can actually tell us what will happen following a change. Any application of model knowledge requires interpretation of model mechanics - judgements about how those mechanisms translate to circumstances beyond the model. 7/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Embracing the partial nature of models helps us develop a deeper understanding of the mechanisms being modelled. More mechanisms may make models more realistic, but they also make them harder to interpret. 6/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
All models are partial: Economic methodologist Uskali Mäki argues that models always work by isolating particular causal mechanisms. By manipulating the model we explore what happens when those mechanisms interact. Modelling works best when the number of mechanisms being modelled is fairly small 5/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
This is often how models in the public domain are represented: think about economic forecasts from the UK Office for budgetary responsibility. They are treated as definitive statements on future economic performance, despite being inherently partial. 4/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
It is always tempting to add more to a model, to make it more 'realistic'. This is particularly the case when we try to make models for policy: we (and policymakers) want a model of nearly everything. A complete description of reality so that when we model a policy we can "know" what will happen 3/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Our epistemological approach is a core strength of the WISE. We adopt a pluralist position, developing 9 thematic models that speak to particular issues and take different theoretical and methodological paths to get there. The key advantage is that the models are fairly simple & tractable. 2/8
November 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM