simonloncaric.bsky.social
@simonloncaric.bsky.social
What kind of heat pump and what's the COP right now?
January 22, 2025 at 8:15 AM
I never said it was failing, i simply addressed your claim about price with a cherry picked example just as you did. Nuclear was cheap historically and is currently cheap in the East, because they know how to build.
Just for the heck of it here's some more:)
about.bnef.com/blog/soaring...
January 14, 2025 at 1:10 PM
*socialist. And Yugoslavia was one of the founding members of the non-aligned movement so implying he had ties to the KGB because he was Yugoslav is unfounded at best and stupid at worst.
January 14, 2025 at 5:28 AM
A coffee addict
January 13, 2025 at 5:30 AM
Not sure I'm willing to only bet the future of climate on a group of technologies that haven't managed to decarbonise a single major grid.
January 12, 2025 at 10:28 AM
Nuclear has a 4-9x higher energy production per unit of installed capacity and is dispatchable. So yes apples and oranges.
Will we not need clean power in 10, 20 and 30 years? Will we stop planting trees because they take decades to grow?
System costs are the thing that really matter.
January 10, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Because your post is comparing apples and oranges.
We need all low carbon technologies for quick and robust decarbonisation.
January 10, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Agree, but I also wouldn't complain if we minimize mining.
January 10, 2025 at 12:36 PM
It's also one of the lowest, depending on which source you look at (some sources list wind as lower).
January 10, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Can you post the source of this information? It's also note worthy that capacity does not equal production.
January 10, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Nuclear actually has the lowest material intensity.
January 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Did you know that installed capacity and energy production aren't the same?
January 10, 2025 at 11:30 AM