@sillycheesi.bsky.social
Aren't you the awful no good guy why did you show up in my feed
January 4, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Aren't you the awful no good guy why did you show up in my feed
Hi. Do you have to?
December 12, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Hi. Do you have to?
Why are there 3
October 19, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Why are there 3
And anecdotally my partner's 16yo little brother thinks loss is hilarious :p it's spreading to the youth
October 9, 2025 at 10:41 AM
And anecdotally my partner's 16yo little brother thinks loss is hilarious :p it's spreading to the youth
Elder zoomers are approaching 30
October 9, 2025 at 10:40 AM
Elder zoomers are approaching 30
Like I've said I believe the super rich are inherently messed up, but that's a point we diverge. I'm uninterested in trying to change that here and now
But if we want to stick to the point, all I was actually getting at is that it isn't a sexist thing to say. That holds up whether it's true or not
But if we want to stick to the point, all I was actually getting at is that it isn't a sexist thing to say. That holds up whether it's true or not
October 9, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Like I've said I believe the super rich are inherently messed up, but that's a point we diverge. I'm uninterested in trying to change that here and now
But if we want to stick to the point, all I was actually getting at is that it isn't a sexist thing to say. That holds up whether it's true or not
But if we want to stick to the point, all I was actually getting at is that it isn't a sexist thing to say. That holds up whether it's true or not
Well this was all about someone saying she had her brain broken in relation to her welath. You said this was sexist and I said that no, welath breaking people's brains is a pretty well known thing across genders and that's all I really wanted to say but I'm easily led astray.
October 9, 2025 at 12:23 AM
Well this was all about someone saying she had her brain broken in relation to her welath. You said this was sexist and I said that no, welath breaking people's brains is a pretty well known thing across genders and that's all I really wanted to say but I'm easily led astray.
I wasn't saying any of this to prove she's a bad person. I don't care if someone's a bad person or not, it doesn't affect anything. Being psychologically messed up by being extremely rich doesn't make you a bad person intrinsically
October 9, 2025 at 12:15 AM
I wasn't saying any of this to prove she's a bad person. I don't care if someone's a bad person or not, it doesn't affect anything. Being psychologically messed up by being extremely rich doesn't make you a bad person intrinsically
Scholarship on wealth pretty conclusively shows that higher wealth correlates with lower empathy, higher selfishness etc. Being do-whatever-you-want-forever-rich inherently puts you in a position of such immense privilege that it's plain impossible to understand what most people go through.
October 9, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Scholarship on wealth pretty conclusively shows that higher wealth correlates with lower empathy, higher selfishness etc. Being do-whatever-you-want-forever-rich inherently puts you in a position of such immense privilege that it's plain impossible to understand what most people go through.
I'm trying to expand on what the person you replied to was saying:
Fine by billionaire standards.
Billionaire standards being that they're utterly incapable of relating to the overwhelming majority of people. They're all messed up, you don't need to prove it individually.
Fine by billionaire standards.
Billionaire standards being that they're utterly incapable of relating to the overwhelming majority of people. They're all messed up, you don't need to prove it individually.
October 8, 2025 at 11:57 PM
I'm trying to expand on what the person you replied to was saying:
Fine by billionaire standards.
Billionaire standards being that they're utterly incapable of relating to the overwhelming majority of people. They're all messed up, you don't need to prove it individually.
Fine by billionaire standards.
Billionaire standards being that they're utterly incapable of relating to the overwhelming majority of people. They're all messed up, you don't need to prove it individually.
I didn't say I specifically think this about specifically her, I honestly don't know or care much about her. But it's well studied that the super rich as a class are unable to relate to basically any regular human experience and it messes them up real bad.
October 8, 2025 at 11:53 PM
I didn't say I specifically think this about specifically her, I honestly don't know or care much about her. But it's well studied that the super rich as a class are unable to relate to basically any regular human experience and it messes them up real bad.
Nobody you're replying to said anything about who she's dating in relation to her intelligence. It's the money, being super rich breaks a person's brain. The same thing is observed in men all the time, see Musk, Bezos, Zuck, etc.
October 8, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Nobody you're replying to said anything about who she's dating in relation to her intelligence. It's the money, being super rich breaks a person's brain. The same thing is observed in men all the time, see Musk, Bezos, Zuck, etc.
All right, I'll keep that in mind.
In any case I didn't mean to come off too quippy, it's too easily done here. I just don't reslly see how the topic of billionaires' minds being rendered soup by their immense money, fame and power relates to misogyny here, it's something observed across genders.
In any case I didn't mean to come off too quippy, it's too easily done here. I just don't reslly see how the topic of billionaires' minds being rendered soup by their immense money, fame and power relates to misogyny here, it's something observed across genders.
October 8, 2025 at 11:35 PM
All right, I'll keep that in mind.
In any case I didn't mean to come off too quippy, it's too easily done here. I just don't reslly see how the topic of billionaires' minds being rendered soup by their immense money, fame and power relates to misogyny here, it's something observed across genders.
In any case I didn't mean to come off too quippy, it's too easily done here. I just don't reslly see how the topic of billionaires' minds being rendered soup by their immense money, fame and power relates to misogyny here, it's something observed across genders.
All right then, I'm not a man and I also think you're being a little silly here.
October 8, 2025 at 11:23 PM
All right then, I'm not a man and I also think you're being a little silly here.
I mean don't get me wrong, I write things for enjoyment that only I will ever see, but usually the biggest motivator for me to do something is that it's for an RPG and I want to share it with my friends, I want them to have fun with it :) sharing art is important and it sucks when you can't
September 28, 2025 at 8:49 PM
I mean don't get me wrong, I write things for enjoyment that only I will ever see, but usually the biggest motivator for me to do something is that it's for an RPG and I want to share it with my friends, I want them to have fun with it :) sharing art is important and it sucks when you can't
Honestly I don't even think "create for yourself" IS great and all. Create to communicate something to another person! Share ideas, experiences, knowledge!
September 28, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Honestly I don't even think "create for yourself" IS great and all. Create to communicate something to another person! Share ideas, experiences, knowledge!
Yeah they're not really for constructed play, but do their jobs as draft commons go, usually fill a fine role in the mana curve. The flying ones especially!
September 25, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Yeah they're not really for constructed play, but do their jobs as draft commons go, usually fill a fine role in the mana curve. The flying ones especially!
5 is the usual cost for this effect on a creature, It's usually pretty good in limited.
Basically the idea is that it's already a decent creature so the ability doesn't need to be super efficient, it's just there for when the game goes longer and you need to pump your board to kill.
Basically the idea is that it's already a decent creature so the ability doesn't need to be super efficient, it's just there for when the game goes longer and you need to pump your board to kill.
September 25, 2025 at 1:41 PM
5 is the usual cost for this effect on a creature, It's usually pretty good in limited.
Basically the idea is that it's already a decent creature so the ability doesn't need to be super efficient, it's just there for when the game goes longer and you need to pump your board to kill.
Basically the idea is that it's already a decent creature so the ability doesn't need to be super efficient, it's just there for when the game goes longer and you need to pump your board to kill.
I *initially* found SAWLM through Wheeler but enjoyed your presence enough to check out the other stuff you do without him in it :)
September 25, 2025 at 1:25 PM
I *initially* found SAWLM through Wheeler but enjoyed your presence enough to check out the other stuff you do without him in it :)
There's plenty, really. It's happened many times before and it's always been terrible.
September 15, 2025 at 3:45 AM
There's plenty, really. It's happened many times before and it's always been terrible.