Silent Cycling
@silent-cycling.bsky.social
An environmentally concerned being that doesn't want to see humans having to preserve nature in space.
Humanity wake up and see unity is the only solution. Though how to achieve that could have desperately different outcomes.
Humanity wake up and see unity is the only solution. Though how to achieve that could have desperately different outcomes.
The USA become high seas pirates?
He's not the Criminal in Chief for nothing.
He's not the Criminal in Chief for nothing.
December 11, 2025 at 7:45 PM
The USA become high seas pirates?
He's not the Criminal in Chief for nothing.
He's not the Criminal in Chief for nothing.
My reading on this is that it's evidence Farage betrayed Britain in Russian interest working to achieve Brexit.
Who in the world most wanted Brexit... Putin.
Who was paying those around Farage (and wouldn't be surprised if Farage profited too) - Putin.
Who in the world most wanted Brexit... Putin.
Who was paying those around Farage (and wouldn't be surprised if Farage profited too) - Putin.
December 7, 2025 at 7:27 PM
My reading on this is that it's evidence Farage betrayed Britain in Russian interest working to achieve Brexit.
Who in the world most wanted Brexit... Putin.
Who was paying those around Farage (and wouldn't be surprised if Farage profited too) - Putin.
Who in the world most wanted Brexit... Putin.
Who was paying those around Farage (and wouldn't be surprised if Farage profited too) - Putin.
Personally if I needed a pointlessly large, pointlessly expensive car I'd honestly love one of these pink Jag's (no sarcasm, really I'd love one if I needed such a thing)
images.pistonheads.com/nimg/49274/b...
Can't believe the conservative anti woke war it seems to have attracted.
images.pistonheads.com/nimg/49274/b...
Can't believe the conservative anti woke war it seems to have attracted.
December 3, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Personally if I needed a pointlessly large, pointlessly expensive car I'd honestly love one of these pink Jag's (no sarcasm, really I'd love one if I needed such a thing)
images.pistonheads.com/nimg/49274/b...
Can't believe the conservative anti woke war it seems to have attracted.
images.pistonheads.com/nimg/49274/b...
Can't believe the conservative anti woke war it seems to have attracted.
I don't understand why any lobbyists are let in.
Throw them all out.
End fossil fuel.
May fossil fuel pay compensation.
Throw them all out.
End fossil fuel.
May fossil fuel pay compensation.
November 14, 2025 at 9:45 AM
I don't understand why any lobbyists are let in.
Throw them all out.
End fossil fuel.
May fossil fuel pay compensation.
Throw them all out.
End fossil fuel.
May fossil fuel pay compensation.
That means each person of the 0.1% super rich is actually producing carbon emissions at a rate 400000 times that of a person in the poorest 10%.
Which demonstrates the obscenity better than the 4000x group comparator.
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Which demonstrates the obscenity better than the 4000x group comparator.
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
October 29, 2025 at 10:27 AM
That means each person of the 0.1% super rich is actually producing carbon emissions at a rate 400000 times that of a person in the poorest 10%.
Which demonstrates the obscenity better than the 4000x group comparator.
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Which demonstrates the obscenity better than the 4000x group comparator.
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Reform and the right wing press can hound a Labour minister out of their role for tax related issues so which of Reform senior tax dodgers will resign over this? (None, they operate to double standards because they can't be trusted.)
October 20, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Reform and the right wing press can hound a Labour minister out of their role for tax related issues so which of Reform senior tax dodgers will resign over this? (None, they operate to double standards because they can't be trusted.)
Perhaps Tim Davie gave other examples than BLM and Kamala Harris but it's interesting that both the things he's quoted using as examples are things you suspect he's against. While being OK with instances of favouring the right that so frequently happen on the BBC under him.
October 20, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Perhaps Tim Davie gave other examples than BLM and Kamala Harris but it's interesting that both the things he's quoted using as examples are things you suspect he's against. While being OK with instances of favouring the right that so frequently happen on the BBC under him.
One of my fav' headlines/titles for a while
October 2, 2025 at 9:29 AM
One of my fav' headlines/titles for a while
Kemi Badenoch vows to commit future generations to extreme suffering, war, famine, drought and mass extinctions.
By ignoring scientific evidence and looking at what is happening around the world right now.
It's idiotic short term attempts at vote grabbing.
By ignoring scientific evidence and looking at what is happening around the world right now.
It's idiotic short term attempts at vote grabbing.
October 2, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Kemi Badenoch vows to commit future generations to extreme suffering, war, famine, drought and mass extinctions.
By ignoring scientific evidence and looking at what is happening around the world right now.
It's idiotic short term attempts at vote grabbing.
By ignoring scientific evidence and looking at what is happening around the world right now.
It's idiotic short term attempts at vote grabbing.
The less open, the more secretive, the less trustable.
When governments try to ban encryption their argument is "you have nothing to worry about if you've nothing to hide".
Any public officials dodging reporting and journalism have to be assumed to be treacherous.
When governments try to ban encryption their argument is "you have nothing to worry about if you've nothing to hide".
Any public officials dodging reporting and journalism have to be assumed to be treacherous.
September 30, 2025 at 6:39 PM
The less open, the more secretive, the less trustable.
When governments try to ban encryption their argument is "you have nothing to worry about if you've nothing to hide".
Any public officials dodging reporting and journalism have to be assumed to be treacherous.
When governments try to ban encryption their argument is "you have nothing to worry about if you've nothing to hide".
Any public officials dodging reporting and journalism have to be assumed to be treacherous.
No Mr Starmer, greater equality and a just society is the antidote to division. And your growth driven bowing to the super rich isn't helping.
September 29, 2025 at 11:37 PM
No Mr Starmer, greater equality and a just society is the antidote to division. And your growth driven bowing to the super rich isn't helping.
Labour, particularly Starmer, are showing tremendous skill at coming up with continuing reasons why they don't get my future vote. This time it's chipping away at the rule of law; again.
September 27, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Labour, particularly Starmer, are showing tremendous skill at coming up with continuing reasons why they don't get my future vote. This time it's chipping away at the rule of law; again.
This kind of messaging worked so well (totally failed) for Harris in the USA presidential elections
Pretty certain people want to hear a positive message with plausible ideas for reaching it.
Pretty certain people want to hear a positive message with plausible ideas for reaching it.
September 26, 2025 at 1:58 PM
This kind of messaging worked so well (totally failed) for Harris in the USA presidential elections
Pretty certain people want to hear a positive message with plausible ideas for reaching it.
Pretty certain people want to hear a positive message with plausible ideas for reaching it.
Even if this were true rather than "10 years away"[1] it would be a bad thing.
[1] the standard physics joke about nuclear fusion, it's been 10 years away for 70 years now.
[1] the standard physics joke about nuclear fusion, it's been 10 years away for 70 years now.
September 16, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Even if this were true rather than "10 years away"[1] it would be a bad thing.
[1] the standard physics joke about nuclear fusion, it's been 10 years away for 70 years now.
[1] the standard physics joke about nuclear fusion, it's been 10 years away for 70 years now.
You can have free speech, so long as you aren't being critical of us...
Just one more example how they speak about free speech but don't actually mean it. Liars and decievers, plain and simple.
Just one more example how they speak about free speech but don't actually mean it. Liars and decievers, plain and simple.
September 16, 2025 at 3:35 PM
You can have free speech, so long as you aren't being critical of us...
Just one more example how they speak about free speech but don't actually mean it. Liars and decievers, plain and simple.
Just one more example how they speak about free speech but don't actually mean it. Liars and decievers, plain and simple.
This kind of trying to get the facts out there has Zack growing on me.
Reform really aren't on the people's side when you look at the details of ideas they support.
Reform really aren't on the people's side when you look at the details of ideas they support.
September 8, 2025 at 10:15 AM
This kind of trying to get the facts out there has Zack growing on me.
Reform really aren't on the people's side when you look at the details of ideas they support.
Reform really aren't on the people's side when you look at the details of ideas they support.
The cost to users will rise and/or the quality drop.
The rich will make a profit off the health of the poor (i.e. the majority of us).
Labour, in doing this, further entrench inequality, with workers getting just enough care to survive another day of work for the rich.
The rich will make a profit off the health of the poor (i.e. the majority of us).
Labour, in doing this, further entrench inequality, with workers getting just enough care to survive another day of work for the rich.
August 20, 2025 at 2:36 PM
The cost to users will rise and/or the quality drop.
The rich will make a profit off the health of the poor (i.e. the majority of us).
Labour, in doing this, further entrench inequality, with workers getting just enough care to survive another day of work for the rich.
The rich will make a profit off the health of the poor (i.e. the majority of us).
Labour, in doing this, further entrench inequality, with workers getting just enough care to survive another day of work for the rich.
I think this author may have the answer (back in 2016)
August 14, 2025 at 1:36 PM
I think this author may have the answer (back in 2016)
Even the Governments own figures reach that kind of range
There's further explanation here
www.gov.uk/government/s...
There's further explanation here
www.gov.uk/government/s...
June 26, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Even the Governments own figures reach that kind of range
There's further explanation here
www.gov.uk/government/s...
There's further explanation here
www.gov.uk/government/s...
Can we assume the rich are snapping up bargains? (Is there evidence either way somewhere)
April 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Can we assume the rich are snapping up bargains? (Is there evidence either way somewhere)
USA immigration policy, another wealth extraction con on the tax payer.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
March 19, 2025 at 8:12 PM
USA immigration policy, another wealth extraction con on the tax payer.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Another reason that Labour lose this vote.
Farcical nonsense today on political programs talking about "depoliticising the NHS". The entire existence of the NHS is political choice. Do you want fair health care or people exploited to pay extortion rates like the USA?
Farcical nonsense today on political programs talking about "depoliticising the NHS". The entire existence of the NHS is political choice. Do you want fair health care or people exploited to pay extortion rates like the USA?
March 11, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Another reason that Labour lose this vote.
Farcical nonsense today on political programs talking about "depoliticising the NHS". The entire existence of the NHS is political choice. Do you want fair health care or people exploited to pay extortion rates like the USA?
Farcical nonsense today on political programs talking about "depoliticising the NHS". The entire existence of the NHS is political choice. Do you want fair health care or people exploited to pay extortion rates like the USA?
They are now even continuing the Conservative attack on judges
February 12, 2025 at 4:52 PM
They are now even continuing the Conservative attack on judges
I'm cheap, one of these would do
February 9, 2025 at 7:29 PM
I'm cheap, one of these would do
And here's another way Labour could throw away all (remaining) credibility and lose more voters leaving them needing to change the voting system before the next election.
The continuation of putting business before people.
The continuation of putting business before people.
February 9, 2025 at 5:22 PM
And here's another way Labour could throw away all (remaining) credibility and lose more voters leaving them needing to change the voting system before the next election.
The continuation of putting business before people.
The continuation of putting business before people.