...straightforward protocols (national flag, legit publishers) to dealing with grey areas (like what constitutes criticism).
So moving forward to the full build, you'll see a smoother transition! And thanks for the feedback again!

...because they are easy to miss. The first article lays out the facts and doesn't involve criticism of the Leader. The second criticizes the Leader for falling "into the trappings of personal cult."
So you've confirmed my suspicion that it is too big of a jump for players to come from censoring-

Thanks for the response! I think I know which articles you're talking about. Those two also tripped a lot of players during cons.
I am assuming these are the ones...
These two are about "facts" and "criticism" in journalism, but players indeed need more explanations in the game (like through email)-

This is the dev here… Could you elaborate on the inconsistencies? Also immersion can be a very broad term. Could you elaborate on that too? Need player feedback!

Of course! Universal healthcare for everyone!

The demo is officially up!! Feel free to check it out.