Girl Guides have finally had to admit that the inclusion of boys in an organisation set up specifically for girls is unlawful under the EA and in contravention of their charitable objects.
Your argument re. GRCs is completely irrelevant.
Your argument re. GRCs is completely irrelevant.
December 5, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Girl Guides have finally had to admit that the inclusion of boys in an organisation set up specifically for girls is unlawful under the EA and in contravention of their charitable objects.
Your argument re. GRCs is completely irrelevant.
Your argument re. GRCs is completely irrelevant.
The EA states: 'man' = "a male of any age"; 'woman' = "a female of any age".
The SC said that 'man' and 'woman' refers to biological sex.
Everyone without a GRC has *always* been legally their biological sex.
The SC ruling changed nothing re. under 18s. Trans girls were always legally boys.
The SC said that 'man' and 'woman' refers to biological sex.
Everyone without a GRC has *always* been legally their biological sex.
The SC ruling changed nothing re. under 18s. Trans girls were always legally boys.
December 5, 2025 at 9:30 PM
The EA states: 'man' = "a male of any age"; 'woman' = "a female of any age".
The SC said that 'man' and 'woman' refers to biological sex.
Everyone without a GRC has *always* been legally their biological sex.
The SC ruling changed nothing re. under 18s. Trans girls were always legally boys.
The SC said that 'man' and 'woman' refers to biological sex.
Everyone without a GRC has *always* been legally their biological sex.
The SC ruling changed nothing re. under 18s. Trans girls were always legally boys.
Goodness, imagine daring to decide which charitable causes you want to donate your own money to? And only giving away £200 million so far, mainly to help vulnerable women and children.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.
August 31, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Goodness, imagine daring to decide which charitable causes you want to donate your own money to? And only giving away £200 million so far, mainly to help vulnerable women and children.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.
Interesting. SM posted about attempts to take their life
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.
August 30, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Interesting. SM posted about attempts to take their life
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.
"..the Supreme Court ruling, which is not the law"
Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.
Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.
August 28, 2025 at 3:52 PM
"..the Supreme Court ruling, which is not the law"
Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.
Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.
Can you explain how you think that an Employment Tribunal decision, in relation to the Equality Act, is in any way relevant to someone tweeting about a public figure? Is the barrister here "Kate"s employer or work colleague? Or providing Kate with goods or services?
August 28, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Can you explain how you think that an Employment Tribunal decision, in relation to the Equality Act, is in any way relevant to someone tweeting about a public figure? Is the barrister here "Kate"s employer or work colleague? Or providing Kate with goods or services?
That's good. They won't have a problem paying the damages awarded to Allison Bailey, then.
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...
ALLISON BAILEY WINS FIRST EVER GENDER CRITICAL JUDGMENT IN THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES — Allison Bailey
You may have seen news reports that I have been engaged in litigation with my former vets. I am pleased to let you know that I have won my case against Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, trading as Palmer...
allisonbailey.co.uk
July 4, 2025 at 1:27 PM
That's good. They won't have a problem paying the damages awarded to Allison Bailey, then.
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...
You should correct this. The '13 years' came from an original incorrect report from a PA new agency reporter. Ireland has been sentenced to 24 years in jail with a further 6 years on extended licence.
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...
Two men jailed after being found guilty of multiple child sex offences
Two men who were found guilty of multiple child sex offences earlier this year are both facing prison sentences following a hearing at Guildford Crown Court today (30 June).
www.surrey.police.uk
June 30, 2025 at 11:22 PM
You should correct this. The '13 years' came from an original incorrect report from a PA new agency reporter. Ireland has been sentenced to 24 years in jail with a further 6 years on extended licence.
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...
Don't be ridiculous. EVERYONE visiting Parliament has to queue and go through airport-style security. I've done it a number of times. Only trans activists would expect to be treated differently from other people and claim victimhood if they are not.
June 26, 2025 at 8:48 AM
Don't be ridiculous. EVERYONE visiting Parliament has to queue and go through airport-style security. I've done it a number of times. Only trans activists would expect to be treated differently from other people and claim victimhood if they are not.
And that includes Labour voting women.
June 14, 2025 at 3:55 PM
And that includes Labour voting women.
Sarah is the Chair of the WOMEN and Equalities Committee. And the majority of women do not want trans women in their spaces or sports, per yougov.
June 14, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Sarah is the Chair of the WOMEN and Equalities Committee. And the majority of women do not want trans women in their spaces or sports, per yougov.
Yes, I am agreeing with you!
June 14, 2025 at 1:08 PM
Yes, I am agreeing with you!
Nope. The legislation/guidance around Boards gave rise to the appeal. The subject matter of the appeal heard by the SC was:
Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?
Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?
June 14, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Nope. The legislation/guidance around Boards gave rise to the appeal. The subject matter of the appeal heard by the SC was:
Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?
Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?
I see you have deleted your post from yesterday claiming - falsely - that the SC ruling has not "become law" but have not removed this statement from your website. When do you plan to do so?
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...
Stonewall responds to the FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans…
The FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans women from women’s football has been made too soon, before the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling…
www.stonewall.org.uk
May 2, 2025 at 7:34 PM
I see you have deleted your post from yesterday claiming - falsely - that the SC ruling has not "become law" but have not removed this statement from your website. When do you plan to do so?
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...
It IS the law. And it has been since 2010.
May 1, 2025 at 7:21 PM
It IS the law. And it has been since 2010.
Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
April 26, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
April 26, 2025 at 12:14 PM
Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
April 26, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
April 26, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...
I'm just letting people know that you are peddling false information and do not understand UK law. I will let them decide for themselves. My work here is done.
bsky.app/profile/sids...
bsky.app/profile/sids...
Probably few know about it now because it is not the law now 😁
Apparently, you were not aware of that.
Apparently, you were not aware of that.
April 26, 2025 at 11:04 AM
I'm just letting people know that you are peddling false information and do not understand UK law. I will let them decide for themselves. My work here is done.
bsky.app/profile/sids...
bsky.app/profile/sids...
Of course they are still protected under multiple categories - the same as everyone else.
Are you speaking today as a lawyer, medical doctor, consultant psychiatrist, surgeon, endocrinologist or a commercial pilot?
You were found out on X and got banned. Now you're lying on here. 🤡
Are you speaking today as a lawyer, medical doctor, consultant psychiatrist, surgeon, endocrinologist or a commercial pilot?
You were found out on X and got banned. Now you're lying on here. 🤡
April 26, 2025 at 10:55 AM
Of course they are still protected under multiple categories - the same as everyone else.
Are you speaking today as a lawyer, medical doctor, consultant psychiatrist, surgeon, endocrinologist or a commercial pilot?
You were found out on X and got banned. Now you're lying on here. 🤡
Are you speaking today as a lawyer, medical doctor, consultant psychiatrist, surgeon, endocrinologist or a commercial pilot?
You were found out on X and got banned. Now you're lying on here. 🤡