This feels like trying to turn an interaction with an individual into "infighting bait"

Allow me to rephrase:
if there's distance between energy, it's because a reaction pushed them apart? And an object in motion tends to stay in motion? So in order for there to be a growing distance between particles, at some point they all had to start together, and a reaction caused them to spread?

Alright, alright, so if there's space between energy, then it's because a reaction pushed them apart? And an object in motion tends to stay in motion? So in order for there to be (a growing) space between particles, at some point they all had to start together, and a reaction caused them to spread?

How can it be empty if it's not empty? A road isn't empty if a car is on it, Space isn't empty if energy passes through it

Is the space between the Earth and the Sun also empty? I was taught that radiation comes from the sun to earth, but space can't be both "empty" and "containing radiation." Where do heat and light come from during what I perceive as "day," in your opinion?

Space has low density, sure, but it's not empty.

Oh I get it, it's like Fairies. Only visible to the ones they deem worthy (you said it's merit-based), but you can't actually reveal them to anybody else.

Is it because you're not going to tell anyone? The scientific community relies on sharing data and checking each other's work. If an idea is being dismissed it's because the tests aren't conclusive.

Prove? I kinda wanna hear how you measured this

Or Genesis, or Exodus, or Joshua...

Disappointed, Yoda is; that his drip, Obi-Wan stole