Shuang Fu
@shuangfu-shawn.bsky.social
I also made an animation.
April 3, 2025 at 4:16 AM
I also made an animation.
Hi Eugene, I have reanalyzed the data in "raw_data_example/". I found and guessed some physical parameters to train the LUNAR LL (the density looks too high for synchronized learning). The PSF used was "averagePSF_32bit.tif". The result looks better than the provided demo analysis.
April 3, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Hi Eugene, I have reanalyzed the data in "raw_data_example/". I found and guessed some physical parameters to train the LUNAR LL (the density looks too high for synchronized learning). The PSF used was "averagePSF_32bit.tif". The result looks better than the provided demo analysis.
Hi Eugene,
Absolutely! This looks interesting, I've been curious how LUNAR handles datasets from different microscopes. But I am not sure whether the physical model in LUNAR matches that of LLS. I will test this next month and share updates as they come.
Absolutely! This looks interesting, I've been curious how LUNAR handles datasets from different microscopes. But I am not sure whether the physical model in LUNAR matches that of LLS. I will test this next month and share updates as they come.
March 28, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Hi Eugene,
Absolutely! This looks interesting, I've been curious how LUNAR handles datasets from different microscopes. But I am not sure whether the physical model in LUNAR matches that of LLS. I will test this next month and share updates as they come.
Absolutely! This looks interesting, I've been curious how LUNAR handles datasets from different microscopes. But I am not sure whether the physical model in LUNAR matches that of LLS. I will test this next month and share updates as they come.