Alexis Shore Ingber
banner
shoreingber.bsky.social
Alexis Shore Ingber
@shoreingber.bsky.social
Trying to help privacy happen. Media law prof @ Syracuse U

More on me here: www.alexisshoreingber.com
Finally, I was on the team for two more wonderful FAccT papers!:

1) Technical Solutions to Emotion AI's Privacy Harms: A Systematic Literature Review

2) AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes
June 22, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Links to the papers:
Emotion AI Regulation: tinyurl.com/bdf7nfth
Emotion AI in Hiring: tinyurl.com/avabvj6d
Sensitivity of Emotion AI Input Data & Recipients: tinyurl.com/3x879x3x
June 22, 2025 at 4:53 PM
On Tuesday (11am) I'll present 2 more papers focused on emotion AI: 1) an experiment comparing job-seekers engagement with a (fake) emotion AI hiring software with non-emotion AI/human and 2) a survey gauging sensitivity perceptions around emotion AI input data and recipients
@haimson.bsky.social
June 22, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Finally, I was on the team for two more wonderful FAccT papers!:

1) Technical Solutions to Emotion AI's Privacy Harms: A Systematic Literature Review

2) AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes
June 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Links to the papers:

Emotion AI Regulation: tinyurl.com/bdf7nfth
Emotion AI in Hiring: tinyurl.com/avabvj6d
Sensitivity of Emotion AI Input Data & Recipients: tinyurl.com/3x879x3x
tinyurl.com
June 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
On Tuesday (11am) I'll present 2 more papers focused on emotion AI: 1) an experiment comparing job-seekers engagement with a (fake) emotion AI hiring software with non-emotion AI/human and 2) a survey gauging sensitivity perceptions around emotion AI input data and recipients @haimson.bsky.social
June 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
3) individuals with disabilities and minoritized genders were
significantly less comfortable than others across a variety of contexts; and 4) perceived accuracy explained a large proportion of the variance in comfort levels across contexts. #CHI2025
March 4, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Reposted by Alexis Shore Ingber
1) Although comfort was distinct across 11 contexts, even the most favorable context (healthcare) yielded low comfort levels; 2) participants were significantly more comfortable with inferences of happiness and surprise compared to other emotions; #CHI2025
March 4, 2025 at 6:58 PM