🪡 Misrepresenting this study goes well beyond what the data support.🧵

Here is the link:
link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Also not it’s under editorial review.

🪡 and the authors explicitly warn about detection bias and residual confounding.

The increased cancer diagnoses are far more plausibly explained by healthcare re-engagement and screening effects post-pandemic, something widely documented across multiple countries. 🪡

He is one of the most deranged individuals on that platform.

There’s no evidence supporting “millions” of vaccine caused deaths or anything exceeding deaths from all wars combined. Excess mortality is being misattributed, military language is metaphorical, and doctors aren’t “civilian forces.” Screenshots and blogs aren’t data.

Sadly we shall never know, but it’s the sad fact anti-vaxers don’t like being confronted with.

Just look at the damage RFK did to Samoa.

So brazen they even admit to mass reporting now.

It’s gotten worse as well, Grok doesn’t help as it’s by far the worst AI by a mile, he can be lead ridiculously easily. You then have people claiming a win because they presupposed Grok to say what they want.

If you try and debate in good faith on X, you get dog piled and mass reported.

Harry has said some truly vile things on X

I wonder why no one wants to advertise on a conspiracy laden platform rife with racism, misogyny etc etc.

More than likely right, RFK has form for this, look at Samoa.

Maybe his mass deportation promises will be fulfilled by people leaving the country in terror.

And the conmen will profit off other’s misery and death.

You say that but one of them said “Are you so dense that you think the sky is beneath the ground”

I think most of the AV crowd I have engaged with have been flerfs, even my AV relatives became flerfs after going down the rabbit hole.

It will get steadily worse as well, these idiots now feel empowered to say whatever they like.

Looked what he stoked up in Samoa and who paid the ultimate price.