3. How can logical fallacies such as appeals to emotion, nature and tradition be used to convince a population to give up personal freedoms and protections to serve the “greater good”. Provide historical and modern examples of instances where this has occurred and argue for or against.

2. Drawing from historical and modern case law, what are some ways in which “the rule of law” can shape private behaviour and restrict personal freedom? (Comstock act, anti protest laws)

Would this have a positive or detrimental effect on government war efforts? Are there any modern day events that you can compare and contrast to this historical event?

📌