Bernard Sheppard
@sheppo.au
Reposted by Bernard Sheppard
None of them go into research. Too much work.
February 8, 2025 at 12:59 AM
None of them go into research. Too much work.
Reposted by Bernard Sheppard
7. This order did not come out of nowhere. It was a core component of Lindsey Burke's Dept. of Education chapter in the Project 2025 report.
(Private foundations typically pay 10-15% overhead rates, and the logic of this comparison is made explicit in today's Supplemental Guidance from NIH.)
(Private foundations typically pay 10-15% overhead rates, and the logic of this comparison is made explicit in today's Supplemental Guidance from NIH.)
February 8, 2025 at 12:41 AM
7. This order did not come out of nowhere. It was a core component of Lindsey Burke's Dept. of Education chapter in the Project 2025 report.
(Private foundations typically pay 10-15% overhead rates, and the logic of this comparison is made explicit in today's Supplemental Guidance from NIH.)
(Private foundations typically pay 10-15% overhead rates, and the logic of this comparison is made explicit in today's Supplemental Guidance from NIH.)
Such a simple, devastating demolition of DAC.
Brings back memories of the short time I was employed in renewable strategy by an O&G major after our electricity retailer was acquired in a takeover. I made a similar case to my manager, who got it. I quit when greenwashing > renewable development.
Brings back memories of the short time I was employed in renewable strategy by an O&G major after our electricity retailer was acquired in a takeover. I made a similar case to my manager, who got it. I quit when greenwashing > renewable development.
January 17, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Such a simple, devastating demolition of DAC.
Brings back memories of the short time I was employed in renewable strategy by an O&G major after our electricity retailer was acquired in a takeover. I made a similar case to my manager, who got it. I quit when greenwashing > renewable development.
Brings back memories of the short time I was employed in renewable strategy by an O&G major after our electricity retailer was acquired in a takeover. I made a similar case to my manager, who got it. I quit when greenwashing > renewable development.
Reposted by Bernard Sheppard
Reversing entropy is energy intensive.
That tells you everything you need to know about direct capture.
It is technically feasible.
It is economically costly.
At scale, it is environmentally risky.
That tells you everything you need to know about direct capture.
It is technically feasible.
It is economically costly.
At scale, it is environmentally risky.
January 16, 2025 at 10:27 AM
Reversing entropy is energy intensive.
That tells you everything you need to know about direct capture.
It is technically feasible.
It is economically costly.
At scale, it is environmentally risky.
That tells you everything you need to know about direct capture.
It is technically feasible.
It is economically costly.
At scale, it is environmentally risky.