Shelly Ellsworth Brown
@shellybrown2025.bsky.social
Lawyer. Public Defender. Defender of parents' rights. Lover of all things horse related. Horrified at what is happening in my country. No DMs please!
Reposted by Shelly Ellsworth Brown
DeSantis has unilaterally lifted laws so he & his aides can hand out no-bid contracts, pay overtime to managers and buy boats, planes & cars.
$150 million worth of taxpayer-financed contracts have already been rapidly handed out.
Industrialised cruelty as a front for corruption.
$150 million worth of taxpayer-financed contracts have already been rapidly handed out.
Industrialised cruelty as a front for corruption.
July 13, 2025 at 4:12 PM
DeSantis has unilaterally lifted laws so he & his aides can hand out no-bid contracts, pay overtime to managers and buy boats, planes & cars.
$150 million worth of taxpayer-financed contracts have already been rapidly handed out.
Industrialised cruelty as a front for corruption.
$150 million worth of taxpayer-financed contracts have already been rapidly handed out.
Industrialised cruelty as a front for corruption.
And Jose Diaz Balart.
May 2, 2025 at 8:12 PM
And Jose Diaz Balart.
I try to do these daily. The reward is usually minimal, if any.
😞
😞
April 29, 2025 at 12:51 AM
I try to do these daily. The reward is usually minimal, if any.
😞
😞
Reposted by Shelly Ellsworth Brown
At the end of the bill, there are two major restrictions on the judiciary and on litigation:
First, the below bans judges from enforcing contempt unless there was an FRCP 65(c) bond (rare in civil rights suits). Obviously aimed to stop Boasberg.
Second, they would bar money damages in settlements.
First, the below bans judges from enforcing contempt unless there was an FRCP 65(c) bond (rare in civil rights suits). Obviously aimed to stop Boasberg.
Second, they would bar money damages in settlements.
April 28, 2025 at 7:38 PM
At the end of the bill, there are two major restrictions on the judiciary and on litigation:
First, the below bans judges from enforcing contempt unless there was an FRCP 65(c) bond (rare in civil rights suits). Obviously aimed to stop Boasberg.
Second, they would bar money damages in settlements.
First, the below bans judges from enforcing contempt unless there was an FRCP 65(c) bond (rare in civil rights suits). Obviously aimed to stop Boasberg.
Second, they would bar money damages in settlements.
He’s a babbling fool.
April 17, 2025 at 2:02 PM
He’s a babbling fool.