@shelbyhobohm.bsky.social
Nuclear Engineering PhD Student & Law Student! Passionate about all things nuclear energy and the law. Side interests include comedy, baking, reading, and board games :)
Thank you so much! I’m in my first year and will be spending this summer doing IP work and next summer doing nuclear and energy related work!
May 1, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Thank you so much! I’m in my first year and will be spending this summer doing IP work and next summer doing nuclear and energy related work!
Funnily enough they cite to the licensing documentation for the 38 g number, but just are so clueless that they thought the first number they saw was good enough
April 30, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Funnily enough they cite to the licensing documentation for the 38 g number, but just are so clueless that they thought the first number they saw was good enough
the lawsuit itself claims that UT’s TRIGA reactor core only has 38 grams of U-235 total, when in reality it’s 38 g/fuel element. These people couldn’t even get decent nuclear engineers to fact check their science
April 30, 2025 at 4:42 AM
the lawsuit itself claims that UT’s TRIGA reactor core only has 38 grams of U-235 total, when in reality it’s 38 g/fuel element. These people couldn’t even get decent nuclear engineers to fact check their science
As someone who has been analyzing this lawsuit from both a law and nuclear engineer standpoint… these types of wildly baseless claims make up the actual complaint tok
April 30, 2025 at 4:41 AM
As someone who has been analyzing this lawsuit from both a law and nuclear engineer standpoint… these types of wildly baseless claims make up the actual complaint tok