That’s a fair point. One way to spin it is to get them to share their approaches to adding and subtracting those numbers. It’s been a while since I’ve done this with students, but I remember there being potential for good math talk.
November 10, 2025 at 1:35 PM
That’s a fair point. One way to spin it is to get them to share their approaches to adding and subtracting those numbers. It’s been a while since I’ve done this with students, but I remember there being potential for good math talk.
My students love Cramer’s rule. They like to look back on all their algebra work and see how this approach solves all 2x2 systems from previous classes. The fact that it works beyond is something of a bonus for us. Here is our justification for it:
November 10, 2025 at 12:46 PM
My students love Cramer’s rule. They like to look back on all their algebra work and see how this approach solves all 2x2 systems from previous classes. The fact that it works beyond is something of a bonus for us. Here is our justification for it:
Scientific notation is so much fun! Just show them the powers of ten video and hook them and the vast size of exponential numbers and the amazing infinitesimals of the atomic universe!!
November 10, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Scientific notation is so much fun! Just show them the powers of ten video and hook them and the vast size of exponential numbers and the amazing infinitesimals of the atomic universe!!
I would still teach it, because I also want my students to see when, and when not, to apply a tool. It’s like helping students do 1000 - 999 with, and without, stacking and borrowing. Seeing the contrast in algorithms on a particular problem is really fun and interesting!
November 3, 2025 at 1:05 PM
I would still teach it, because I also want my students to see when, and when not, to apply a tool. It’s like helping students do 1000 - 999 with, and without, stacking and borrowing. Seeing the contrast in algorithms on a particular problem is really fun and interesting!
(2/2) I use the fact that (x - (a - bi))(x - (a+ bi)) = x^2 -2ax + (a^2 +b^2) and I like this because it emphasizes the sum of squares. Your student's approach simplifies to the same short cut and I love it! Way to go!!!
October 29, 2025 at 12:47 AM
(2/2) I use the fact that (x - (a - bi))(x - (a+ bi)) = x^2 -2ax + (a^2 +b^2) and I like this because it emphasizes the sum of squares. Your student's approach simplifies to the same short cut and I love it! Way to go!!!