Shany Mor
@shanymor.bsky.social
I’m not going to continue this discussion as you either don’t understand the point or are pretending. The excuses for the lack of outrage were equally valid in October 2023 but were not applied. Next time read the article before responding.
July 3, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I’m not going to continue this discussion as you either don’t understand the point or are pretending. The excuses for the lack of outrage were equally valid in October 2023 but were not applied. Next time read the article before responding.
And yet, post October 7, human rights groups lined up to defend Gazans. So this thesis doesn’t hold. You are arguing with a phantom, not my actual article.
July 3, 2025 at 5:04 PM
And yet, post October 7, human rights groups lined up to defend Gazans. So this thesis doesn’t hold. You are arguing with a phantom, not my actual article.
Cool.
The question raised by the article is not why partisans of Israel or its enemies rationalize these allegiances and those blind spots, but why self-proclaimed humanitarians and IHL scholars do.
The question raised by the article is not why partisans of Israel or its enemies rationalize these allegiances and those blind spots, but why self-proclaimed humanitarians and IHL scholars do.
July 3, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Cool.
The question raised by the article is not why partisans of Israel or its enemies rationalize these allegiances and those blind spots, but why self-proclaimed humanitarians and IHL scholars do.
The question raised by the article is not why partisans of Israel or its enemies rationalize these allegiances and those blind spots, but why self-proclaimed humanitarians and IHL scholars do.
You thought you were making a clever critique, and ending up proving the article's point. Thank you.
July 3, 2025 at 4:33 PM
You thought you were making a clever critique, and ending up proving the article's point. Thank you.
You clearly did not read the article.
It asks, among other things, why arguments like yours are deployed against Israelis by people who didn't deploy them against Palestinians in the aftermath of October 7.
It asks, among other things, why arguments like yours are deployed against Israelis by people who didn't deploy them against Palestinians in the aftermath of October 7.
July 3, 2025 at 4:32 PM
You clearly did not read the article.
It asks, among other things, why arguments like yours are deployed against Israelis by people who didn't deploy them against Palestinians in the aftermath of October 7.
It asks, among other things, why arguments like yours are deployed against Israelis by people who didn't deploy them against Palestinians in the aftermath of October 7.
Reposted by Shany Mor
Maybe, just maybe Deborah Lipstadt understands something that you don't. And the entire lexicon of denial you've deployed over a decade of writing about this ("conflating" "silencing criticism" etc.) has helped you renew membership in the community of the good but blinded you to the lurking danger.
May 22, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Maybe, just maybe Deborah Lipstadt understands something that you don't. And the entire lexicon of denial you've deployed over a decade of writing about this ("conflating" "silencing criticism" etc.) has helped you renew membership in the community of the good but blinded you to the lurking danger.
... the very phenomenon you won't see and can't see, because it would have such a high social price for figures such as yourself. The biggest Bengelsdorf of all is a colleague, after all.
May 22, 2025 at 9:34 AM
... the very phenomenon you won't see and can't see, because it would have such a high social price for figures such as yourself. The biggest Bengelsdorf of all is a colleague, after all.
Weird that you think Philip Roth missed something when he had it right there in the character of Rabbi Bengelsdorf. The preening Jew who clings to powerful institutions while ignoring and excusing their manifest antisemitism, convincing himself he understands what's best for Jews describes...
May 22, 2025 at 9:34 AM
Weird that you think Philip Roth missed something when he had it right there in the character of Rabbi Bengelsdorf. The preening Jew who clings to powerful institutions while ignoring and excusing their manifest antisemitism, convincing himself he understands what's best for Jews describes...
Maybe, just maybe Deborah Lipstadt understands something that you don't. And the entire lexicon of denial you've deployed over a decade of writing about this ("conflating" "silencing criticism" etc.) has helped you renew membership in the community of the good but blinded you to the lurking danger.
May 22, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Maybe, just maybe Deborah Lipstadt understands something that you don't. And the entire lexicon of denial you've deployed over a decade of writing about this ("conflating" "silencing criticism" etc.) has helped you renew membership in the community of the good but blinded you to the lurking danger.
The first and second sentence of your post contradict each other.
May 9, 2025 at 10:38 AM
The first and second sentence of your post contradict each other.
On direct talks between the US and Hamas and what incentives and disincentives might move it:
March 12, 2025 at 12:52 PM
On direct talks between the US and Hamas and what incentives and disincentives might move it:
On being stuck between the first and second phases of the ceasefire:
March 12, 2025 at 12:52 PM
On being stuck between the first and second phases of the ceasefire: