@shadowmaster4901.bsky.social
Classic Fnaf fan, starwars fan, and sonic enjoyer.
Le epic gamer and dirty joke enjoyer
Le epic gamer and dirty joke enjoyer
Damn that text looks familiar
I guess many people feel as I do
I guess many people feel as I do
June 22, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Damn that text looks familiar
I guess many people feel as I do
I guess many people feel as I do
Nah it’s fine.
January 21, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Nah it’s fine.
I’m actually very happy right now.
RTTP is one of my favorite fnaf books, it was very enjoyable.
And not only is it a good book, but it debunked SLG (no Andrew no stitchline)
You’re literally coping. That’s why you’re typing in all caps and ignoring everything RTTP says.
Your theory got debunked.
RTTP is one of my favorite fnaf books, it was very enjoyable.
And not only is it a good book, but it debunked SLG (no Andrew no stitchline)
You’re literally coping. That’s why you’re typing in all caps and ignoring everything RTTP says.
Your theory got debunked.
January 21, 2025 at 3:17 AM
I’m actually very happy right now.
RTTP is one of my favorite fnaf books, it was very enjoyable.
And not only is it a good book, but it debunked SLG (no Andrew no stitchline)
You’re literally coping. That’s why you’re typing in all caps and ignoring everything RTTP says.
Your theory got debunked.
RTTP is one of my favorite fnaf books, it was very enjoyable.
And not only is it a good book, but it debunked SLG (no Andrew no stitchline)
You’re literally coping. That’s why you’re typing in all caps and ignoring everything RTTP says.
Your theory got debunked.
Yeah. And now almost 7 years after UCN we’ve finally have had Cassidy’s gender confirmed.
Not only that, but we know what her hair looks like (curly) and it is implied that her last name is “Andrews”
No Scott never confirmed SL as being in the games timeline. In fact with RTTP he did the opposite.
Not only that, but we know what her hair looks like (curly) and it is implied that her last name is “Andrews”
No Scott never confirmed SL as being in the games timeline. In fact with RTTP he did the opposite.
January 21, 2025 at 3:08 AM
Yeah. And now almost 7 years after UCN we’ve finally have had Cassidy’s gender confirmed.
Not only that, but we know what her hair looks like (curly) and it is implied that her last name is “Andrews”
No Scott never confirmed SL as being in the games timeline. In fact with RTTP he did the opposite.
Not only that, but we know what her hair looks like (curly) and it is implied that her last name is “Andrews”
No Scott never confirmed SL as being in the games timeline. In fact with RTTP he did the opposite.
This is the ACTUAL story.
The FF books literally being in the games timeline was a THEORY. It was never confirmed by Scott.
Scott has released a book that we know is gameline (RTTP) which debunks it (no Andrew)
SCOTT JUST GAVE US THE ANSWER. You’re just mad because it’s not the one YOU WANTED.
The FF books literally being in the games timeline was a THEORY. It was never confirmed by Scott.
Scott has released a book that we know is gameline (RTTP) which debunks it (no Andrew)
SCOTT JUST GAVE US THE ANSWER. You’re just mad because it’s not the one YOU WANTED.
January 21, 2025 at 3:05 AM
This is the ACTUAL story.
The FF books literally being in the games timeline was a THEORY. It was never confirmed by Scott.
Scott has released a book that we know is gameline (RTTP) which debunks it (no Andrew)
SCOTT JUST GAVE US THE ANSWER. You’re just mad because it’s not the one YOU WANTED.
The FF books literally being in the games timeline was a THEORY. It was never confirmed by Scott.
Scott has released a book that we know is gameline (RTTP) which debunks it (no Andrew)
SCOTT JUST GAVE US THE ANSWER. You’re just mad because it’s not the one YOU WANTED.
That’s what Andrew was: A completely new character with a completely unknown and unsolvable backstory.
And when the ITPgame gave him one (MCI victim #6)
then RTTP straight up just doesn’t have him.
The same RTTP that is in the same book series as TWB.
We got the answer.
The book debate IS OVER.
And when the ITPgame gave him one (MCI victim #6)
then RTTP straight up just doesn’t have him.
The same RTTP that is in the same book series as TWB.
We got the answer.
The book debate IS OVER.
January 21, 2025 at 3:01 AM
That’s what Andrew was: A completely new character with a completely unknown and unsolvable backstory.
And when the ITPgame gave him one (MCI victim #6)
then RTTP straight up just doesn’t have him.
The same RTTP that is in the same book series as TWB.
We got the answer.
The book debate IS OVER.
And when the ITPgame gave him one (MCI victim #6)
then RTTP straight up just doesn’t have him.
The same RTTP that is in the same book series as TWB.
We got the answer.
The book debate IS OVER.
I feel like it literally does make it Cassidy by default.
Like Scott isn’t stupid, he knows about the debate.
Much like how MM was about William, UCN is being done by GF. ESPECIALLY given 14 theory basically screaming that toyshnk NEEDS to have a connection to GF
Like Scott isn’t stupid, he knows about the debate.
Much like how MM was about William, UCN is being done by GF. ESPECIALLY given 14 theory basically screaming that toyshnk NEEDS to have a connection to GF
January 21, 2025 at 2:53 AM
I feel like it literally does make it Cassidy by default.
Like Scott isn’t stupid, he knows about the debate.
Much like how MM was about William, UCN is being done by GF. ESPECIALLY given 14 theory basically screaming that toyshnk NEEDS to have a connection to GF
Like Scott isn’t stupid, he knows about the debate.
Much like how MM was about William, UCN is being done by GF. ESPECIALLY given 14 theory basically screaming that toyshnk NEEDS to have a connection to GF
Well clearly not because if he did then he would have put Andrew in RTTP.
Or he would have had any hints about Andrew in the newer games, such as an alligator mask.
Or well literally anything.
Or h
Or he would have had any hints about Andrew in the newer games, such as an alligator mask.
Or well literally anything.
Or h
January 21, 2025 at 2:51 AM
Well clearly not because if he did then he would have put Andrew in RTTP.
Or he would have had any hints about Andrew in the newer games, such as an alligator mask.
Or well literally anything.
Or h
Or he would have had any hints about Andrew in the newer games, such as an alligator mask.
Or well literally anything.
Or h
If Scott wanted to tell me Andrew was in the games then he would have put Andrew in RTTP.
I would have no argument against Andrew at that point.
Scott had all the reason in the world to put Andrew in the book and end the book debate in SLG’s favor.
Yet he did the opposite and debunked SLG.
I would have no argument against Andrew at that point.
Scott had all the reason in the world to put Andrew in the book and end the book debate in SLG’s favor.
Yet he did the opposite and debunked SLG.
January 21, 2025 at 2:48 AM
If Scott wanted to tell me Andrew was in the games then he would have put Andrew in RTTP.
I would have no argument against Andrew at that point.
Scott had all the reason in the world to put Andrew in the book and end the book debate in SLG’s favor.
Yet he did the opposite and debunked SLG.
I would have no argument against Andrew at that point.
Scott had all the reason in the world to put Andrew in the book and end the book debate in SLG’s favor.
Yet he did the opposite and debunked SLG.
“Andrew was hung” or “Andrew was an experiment victim” is utter copium.
In order to prove Andrew was either of these you must first prove he’s in the games, something that RTTP has made EXTREMELY UNLIKELY (and IMO is debunked)
Andrew is the 6th MCI victim.
The only time the MCI has been 6 IS FF.
In order to prove Andrew was either of these you must first prove he’s in the games, something that RTTP has made EXTREMELY UNLIKELY (and IMO is debunked)
Andrew is the 6th MCI victim.
The only time the MCI has been 6 IS FF.
January 21, 2025 at 2:41 AM
“Andrew was hung” or “Andrew was an experiment victim” is utter copium.
In order to prove Andrew was either of these you must first prove he’s in the games, something that RTTP has made EXTREMELY UNLIKELY (and IMO is debunked)
Andrew is the 6th MCI victim.
The only time the MCI has been 6 IS FF.
In order to prove Andrew was either of these you must first prove he’s in the games, something that RTTP has made EXTREMELY UNLIKELY (and IMO is debunked)
Andrew is the 6th MCI victim.
The only time the MCI has been 6 IS FF.
My guy. RTTP says that the ballpit is in full view of the stage.
People would see William stabbing him, strangling him in the netting, etc
William wouldn’t have gotten away with it.
The entire reason he got away with it was because the bodies were hidden where no one would look.
The suits.
People would see William stabbing him, strangling him in the netting, etc
William wouldn’t have gotten away with it.
The entire reason he got away with it was because the bodies were hidden where no one would look.
The suits.
January 21, 2025 at 2:38 AM
My guy. RTTP says that the ballpit is in full view of the stage.
People would see William stabbing him, strangling him in the netting, etc
William wouldn’t have gotten away with it.
The entire reason he got away with it was because the bodies were hidden where no one would look.
The suits.
People would see William stabbing him, strangling him in the netting, etc
William wouldn’t have gotten away with it.
The entire reason he got away with it was because the bodies were hidden where no one would look.
The suits.
When did Gregory go to the pit?
There is an arcade machine that has GGY on it.
Or is that just an “Easter egg”
How many “Easter eggs” does it take before you get the omelette that is “ITPg is a for fun game”?
I’d recommend watching the unwithered truth’s video on the ITP game. It explains a lot.
There is an arcade machine that has GGY on it.
Or is that just an “Easter egg”
How many “Easter eggs” does it take before you get the omelette that is “ITPg is a for fun game”?
I’d recommend watching the unwithered truth’s video on the ITP game. It explains a lot.
January 21, 2025 at 2:36 AM
When did Gregory go to the pit?
There is an arcade machine that has GGY on it.
Or is that just an “Easter egg”
How many “Easter eggs” does it take before you get the omelette that is “ITPg is a for fun game”?
I’d recommend watching the unwithered truth’s video on the ITP game. It explains a lot.
There is an arcade machine that has GGY on it.
Or is that just an “Easter egg”
How many “Easter eggs” does it take before you get the omelette that is “ITPg is a for fun game”?
I’d recommend watching the unwithered truth’s video on the ITP game. It explains a lot.
… out his window.
And when he does so, he breaks the ledge with his weight, falls from the 2nd story, and snaps his neck
Call me crazy, but I’m gonna assume the robot endo is heavier than the child
And when he does so, he breaks the ledge with his weight, falls from the 2nd story, and snaps his neck
Call me crazy, but I’m gonna assume the robot endo is heavier than the child
January 21, 2025 at 2:33 AM
… out his window.
And when he does so, he breaks the ledge with his weight, falls from the 2nd story, and snaps his neck
Call me crazy, but I’m gonna assume the robot endo is heavier than the child
And when he does so, he breaks the ledge with his weight, falls from the 2nd story, and snaps his neck
Call me crazy, but I’m gonna assume the robot endo is heavier than the child
Additionally, and more importantly. Loop theory doesn’t work.
While RTTP may potentially have its own loop.
Loop theory requires both the OG story and the game be apart of it.
And RTTP debunks that.
In the ITP game, the SW is outside of Oswald’s window.
In RTTP, Oswald has the option to climb..
While RTTP may potentially have its own loop.
Loop theory requires both the OG story and the game be apart of it.
And RTTP debunks that.
In the ITP game, the SW is outside of Oswald’s window.
In RTTP, Oswald has the option to climb..
January 21, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Additionally, and more importantly. Loop theory doesn’t work.
While RTTP may potentially have its own loop.
Loop theory requires both the OG story and the game be apart of it.
And RTTP debunks that.
In the ITP game, the SW is outside of Oswald’s window.
In RTTP, Oswald has the option to climb..
While RTTP may potentially have its own loop.
Loop theory requires both the OG story and the game be apart of it.
And RTTP debunks that.
In the ITP game, the SW is outside of Oswald’s window.
In RTTP, Oswald has the option to climb..
The issue with that is that is again that requires frights to be in the games.
Something it has consistently failed to achieve for 5 years now.
Hell tales did it. Even before it got confirmed we got Midmic’s mid introduction in ruin.
No alligator masks tho.
No giant trash kaijus.
No 6th kid.
Something it has consistently failed to achieve for 5 years now.
Hell tales did it. Even before it got confirmed we got Midmic’s mid introduction in ruin.
No alligator masks tho.
No giant trash kaijus.
No 6th kid.
January 21, 2025 at 2:30 AM
The issue with that is that is again that requires frights to be in the games.
Something it has consistently failed to achieve for 5 years now.
Hell tales did it. Even before it got confirmed we got Midmic’s mid introduction in ruin.
No alligator masks tho.
No giant trash kaijus.
No 6th kid.
Something it has consistently failed to achieve for 5 years now.
Hell tales did it. Even before it got confirmed we got Midmic’s mid introduction in ruin.
No alligator masks tho.
No giant trash kaijus.
No 6th kid.
He purposely did not include Andrew because that is his way of answering the book debate:
“Tales? Have a tiger rock plushie.”
“Eleanor? Oh yeah she can come too.”
“Andrew? Nah. I’m gonna give Cassidy CURLY HAIR. And not have a single reference to Andrew’s existence once in this entire book.”
“Tales? Have a tiger rock plushie.”
“Eleanor? Oh yeah she can come too.”
“Andrew? Nah. I’m gonna give Cassidy CURLY HAIR. And not have a single reference to Andrew’s existence once in this entire book.”
January 21, 2025 at 2:26 AM
He purposely did not include Andrew because that is his way of answering the book debate:
“Tales? Have a tiger rock plushie.”
“Eleanor? Oh yeah she can come too.”
“Andrew? Nah. I’m gonna give Cassidy CURLY HAIR. And not have a single reference to Andrew’s existence once in this entire book.”
“Tales? Have a tiger rock plushie.”
“Eleanor? Oh yeah she can come too.”
“Andrew? Nah. I’m gonna give Cassidy CURLY HAIR. And not have a single reference to Andrew’s existence once in this entire book.”
… is in the same series as THE WEEK BEFORE As in the continuity of the games.
The answer is obvious as I’ve stated many many times:
RETURN TO THE PIT HAS ENDED THE BOOK DEBATE.
No Andrew = no Stitchlinegames
Hell Scott included Eleanor in the damn book, so it’s not like he just forgot Andrew.
The answer is obvious as I’ve stated many many times:
RETURN TO THE PIT HAS ENDED THE BOOK DEBATE.
No Andrew = no Stitchlinegames
Hell Scott included Eleanor in the damn book, so it’s not like he just forgot Andrew.
January 21, 2025 at 2:23 AM
… is in the same series as THE WEEK BEFORE As in the continuity of the games.
The answer is obvious as I’ve stated many many times:
RETURN TO THE PIT HAS ENDED THE BOOK DEBATE.
No Andrew = no Stitchlinegames
Hell Scott included Eleanor in the damn book, so it’s not like he just forgot Andrew.
The answer is obvious as I’ve stated many many times:
RETURN TO THE PIT HAS ENDED THE BOOK DEBATE.
No Andrew = no Stitchlinegames
Hell Scott included Eleanor in the damn book, so it’s not like he just forgot Andrew.
He isn’t in RTTP.
In RTTP is explicitly stated that there are 5 bodies, just like the games, the movie, and even the novels.
And frights (the only place he is CONFIRMED to EVER show up) says the MCI has 6 bodies.
ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS.
And I’m gonna go with the book that…
In RTTP is explicitly stated that there are 5 bodies, just like the games, the movie, and even the novels.
And frights (the only place he is CONFIRMED to EVER show up) says the MCI has 6 bodies.
ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS.
And I’m gonna go with the book that…
January 21, 2025 at 2:19 AM
He isn’t in RTTP.
In RTTP is explicitly stated that there are 5 bodies, just like the games, the movie, and even the novels.
And frights (the only place he is CONFIRMED to EVER show up) says the MCI has 6 bodies.
ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS.
And I’m gonna go with the book that…
In RTTP is explicitly stated that there are 5 bodies, just like the games, the movie, and even the novels.
And frights (the only place he is CONFIRMED to EVER show up) says the MCI has 6 bodies.
ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS.
And I’m gonna go with the book that…
And Andrew….
Like Sammy also doesn’t have any connection to GF.
Andrew also hasn’t shown up in the game’s continuity once.
In fact
Not only does he not show up. But a Mrs. Andrews does.
In TWB.
And it is stated that she “lost her daughter” years ago.
And in RTTP Cassidy has CURLY HAIR.
Like Sammy also doesn’t have any connection to GF.
Andrew also hasn’t shown up in the game’s continuity once.
In fact
Not only does he not show up. But a Mrs. Andrews does.
In TWB.
And it is stated that she “lost her daughter” years ago.
And in RTTP Cassidy has CURLY HAIR.
January 21, 2025 at 2:14 AM
And Andrew….
Like Sammy also doesn’t have any connection to GF.
Andrew also hasn’t shown up in the game’s continuity once.
In fact
Not only does he not show up. But a Mrs. Andrews does.
In TWB.
And it is stated that she “lost her daughter” years ago.
And in RTTP Cassidy has CURLY HAIR.
Like Sammy also doesn’t have any connection to GF.
Andrew also hasn’t shown up in the game’s continuity once.
In fact
Not only does he not show up. But a Mrs. Andrews does.
In TWB.
And it is stated that she “lost her daughter” years ago.
And in RTTP Cassidy has CURLY HAIR.
It’s a child in golden Freddy.
Sammy has no connection to golden Freddy in any way shape or form.
Michael (with a B) is unlikely. It’s stated that the movies are using THE GAMES as their primary source material. Something Michael (with a B) hasn’t shown any evidence of existence within.
Sammy has no connection to golden Freddy in any way shape or form.
Michael (with a B) is unlikely. It’s stated that the movies are using THE GAMES as their primary source material. Something Michael (with a B) hasn’t shown any evidence of existence within.
January 21, 2025 at 2:09 AM
It’s a child in golden Freddy.
Sammy has no connection to golden Freddy in any way shape or form.
Michael (with a B) is unlikely. It’s stated that the movies are using THE GAMES as their primary source material. Something Michael (with a B) hasn’t shown any evidence of existence within.
Sammy has no connection to golden Freddy in any way shape or form.
Michael (with a B) is unlikely. It’s stated that the movies are using THE GAMES as their primary source material. Something Michael (with a B) hasn’t shown any evidence of existence within.
Uh no. Once again. No Andrew. No stitchline.
Eleanor does exist in the games as shown by RTTP. So she can make a pendant in the games if she wanted to.
But the original TBB story clearly isn’t necessary to do that.
At best, it might have an adaptation.
Eleanor does exist in the games as shown by RTTP. So she can make a pendant in the games if she wanted to.
But the original TBB story clearly isn’t necessary to do that.
At best, it might have an adaptation.
January 21, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Uh no. Once again. No Andrew. No stitchline.
Eleanor does exist in the games as shown by RTTP. So she can make a pendant in the games if she wanted to.
But the original TBB story clearly isn’t necessary to do that.
At best, it might have an adaptation.
Eleanor does exist in the games as shown by RTTP. So she can make a pendant in the games if she wanted to.
But the original TBB story clearly isn’t necessary to do that.
At best, it might have an adaptation.
And a bonus 3rd thing. Cassidy is literally a blonde boy in the movie.
Like Scott literally made the golden Freddy actor DYE HIS HAIR just to look more like kid face from UCN.
Like, again I feel like the answer is obvious…
Like Scott literally made the golden Freddy actor DYE HIS HAIR just to look more like kid face from UCN.
Like, again I feel like the answer is obvious…
January 21, 2025 at 2:04 AM
And a bonus 3rd thing. Cassidy is literally a blonde boy in the movie.
Like Scott literally made the golden Freddy actor DYE HIS HAIR just to look more like kid face from UCN.
Like, again I feel like the answer is obvious…
Like Scott literally made the golden Freddy actor DYE HIS HAIR just to look more like kid face from UCN.
Like, again I feel like the answer is obvious…
*fnaf 2
January 21, 2025 at 2:02 AM
*fnaf 2
2 things: 1 this is fnaf. Characters genders can change based on Scott’s mood. Look at Charlie, they were a boy in fnaf.
2. Gender debate is soooooo 2018.
If all you have as counter evidence at this point to golden toyshnk is “muh gender tho” then I genuinely feel bad for you….
2. Gender debate is soooooo 2018.
If all you have as counter evidence at this point to golden toyshnk is “muh gender tho” then I genuinely feel bad for you….
January 21, 2025 at 2:02 AM
2 things: 1 this is fnaf. Characters genders can change based on Scott’s mood. Look at Charlie, they were a boy in fnaf.
2. Gender debate is soooooo 2018.
If all you have as counter evidence at this point to golden toyshnk is “muh gender tho” then I genuinely feel bad for you….
2. Gender debate is soooooo 2018.
If all you have as counter evidence at this point to golden toyshnk is “muh gender tho” then I genuinely feel bad for you….
Eleanor appears in RTTP as I’ve previously mentioned.
So frights doesn’t come along with her.
So frights doesn’t come along with her.
January 21, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Eleanor appears in RTTP as I’ve previously mentioned.
So frights doesn’t come along with her.
So frights doesn’t come along with her.