Sewer Liberal
banner
sewerliberal.bsky.social
Sewer Liberal
@sewerliberal.bsky.social
People still think it's about 'deserving' or it being positive? It's just the person mentioned the most or being most relevant to the news
December 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM
Weirdo
December 10, 2024 at 9:33 PM
What exactly is bad about the article?
December 7, 2024 at 1:22 AM
You clearly do not understand the concept of directly killing someone
December 7, 2024 at 1:18 AM
The CEO also didn't kill anyone directly
December 6, 2024 at 11:52 PM
Depends on how indirect you want to go. It's not like the CEO did shoot someone or killed in any other direct manner. If someone dies after drunk driving, you could argue the Barkeeper is at fault. What about all the CEOs that don't do enough about climate change? Who decides? You think a rando can.
December 6, 2024 at 11:28 PM
Tbf they said 'or a night at home'
December 6, 2024 at 11:14 PM
I am arguing your justification. 'outside of these parameters '.. your parameters are 'if can't go after person legally' that includes every person that didn't do any illegal stuff. So nearly everything is included in your 'parameters'. Just admit that its feelings based. There is no logic to it
December 6, 2024 at 11:13 PM
How do you not understand what you are saying and what it turns into?
December 6, 2024 at 11:01 PM
Read what you are saying. 'if the legal system doesn't offer a way, I don't blame anyone for doing what they felt was necessary'. the legal system doesn't offer a way to go after people if they didn't do anything illegal. So if they don't do illegal stuff, people can do what they feel is necessary.
December 6, 2024 at 10:59 PM
There is either by legal means or political. Murdering CEOs won't help
December 6, 2024 at 10:52 PM
If that were the case, that are normal tariffs that the EU also considers and US has in place already for some products. But that would mean Trump goes back on his promise.
December 6, 2024 at 10:50 PM
Also you said in 99.9% of cases the legal system should decide, implying that in the 0.1% it 'should not' decide and that random people should. You said you were proud of NYC because of the murder. So you did say you want random people to murder people in 0.1% of cases. Don't weasel your way out now
December 6, 2024 at 10:48 PM
But you can. What the CEO did was probably legal. Or did any court rule that well... It can't decide either way because there is no justice system for insurance ceo's? In western legal systems if it is not illegal, it is legal.
December 6, 2024 at 10:43 PM
Themselves if the procedure or med's were important to the survival
December 6, 2024 at 10:41 PM
You said 'But why should they not take any responsibility for causing their death? If the legal system won't do it I don't blame anyone for taking it into their own hands.' so for every insurance that didn't cover a bill and the patient died, the CEO can be murdered. And the people decide by ..
December 6, 2024 at 10:40 PM
You say in 0.1 % of cases it is justified to kill someone if you think the law won't help you (in other words: you don't like what the law does in such a case). Did you not?
December 6, 2024 at 10:30 PM
Don't do your silly "there is no justice system in the US, only for the reach". If you truly think there is no justice system in the US go on and proof it.
December 6, 2024 at 8:22 PM
What country are we talking about? This happened in the US and last I checked the US does have a justice system. It literally is about not liking the existing justice system and than going to murder a person. That is what you are argueing. At least stand by it.
December 6, 2024 at 8:21 PM
You don't blame anyone for doing vigilantism? You don't like how the justice system works -> go kill the person yourself. Great opinion, that wouldn't end in chaos :)
December 6, 2024 at 5:17 PM
If you want to compete with those prices you can't produce in the US. How would Amazon get its products?
December 6, 2024 at 2:41 PM
Please explain how this murder helps in this situation? Is this some kind of take a life bring back a life dark magic I am not aware of? I understand stealing to fund medical expenses but this?
December 6, 2024 at 12:17 PM
It's the same jacket the lighting / color of the picture is just different. Compare the ground compared to the jacket. Also the same scarf.
December 5, 2024 at 5:28 PM
He already did in his first turn. I see people claiming you can't vote for dem's in 2026 now are insane, if this is what the other side does: www.npr.org/2020/12/23/9...
Trump Pardons Roger Stone, Paul Manafort And Charles Kushner
The announcement comes as part of a wave of pardons and commutations in the final weeks of Trump's presidency.
www.npr.org
December 2, 2024 at 1:14 AM