+ arriving at a co-mut(u)ability of planetary & local scales involves conversations between diff localizations in mutually influential & interpenetrating ways
+ how do we simultaneously uphold multiple scales of relationality?

planetary scales, epistemological (re)positioning, perspectival shifts:
can we reconcile untethered relative thinking w/ specificity?
+ politics of location warrants accounting for specificity to avoid tyranny, hegemony, totalization of epistemo-perspectival 'correctness'

these maps inform the way(s) a physical/virtual/conceptual territory is conceived & imagined
+ the misuse of mapping results from when maps remain fixed & unresponsive to situational localization
+ what about extra-localization?
+ can we have both particularity & connectedness/unilaterality at once?

|extra-local -->(beyond- /immediacy\ -within) <-- local|
~conceptual ~material
~abstract ~concrete
~continuous ~discrete

navigation as movement of inclination requiring markers of orientation (referential orientation)
relational navigation & perspectivism operate as so:

navigation as synthesis of local & extra-local relativity
-> mediation of intentionality w/ contingency of unknown/accidental events
--> desire precedes intentionality but can still be influenced by intentionality? (does desire necessarily cause/produce intentionality or is it vice versa?)

cuz genuinely?? if you're going to spend so much time and brainpower reading these difficult texts only to misconstrue and misapply them 😭 so dumb. ig for these ppl they only ever read this stuff to look 'super smart' as if that somehow validates their awful takes

tbh his career has always expressed a level of reserved faith toward post-structuralist thought so i like to think of IDEA as some random sort of interjection, but who am i to keep tabs on how taemin moves