Though*

I can do that too, yes will be longer. Thought what would that have to do with this discussion?

Would shooting missiles at the victims of oppression liberate them?

Furthermore, I didn't say that the Islamic Republic is not using enrichment for pressure. However, to say there was a nuclear bomb threat is a significant leap. One that US intel and the International Atomic Energy Agency itself rejects.

Well, she is the director of US National Intelligence. She would be biased towards claiming a nuclear threat, if anything.
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has also rejected such claims.

I am Iranian and I can provide you with a non-comprehensive list of killed civilians. Would that affect your stance?

In that case, how would a non existent threat of nukes (as testified by Tulsi Gabbard) be a justification for a so called preemptive attack, killing civilians, damaging hospitals, TV stations and jails?
(yes all intentionally)

Do innocent Iranian people and their infrastructure have any place in your considerations?

Is it a common practice to emphasize on diversity while discriminating based on nationality in an "international" school?