Senator Moobs
@senatormoobs.bsky.social
Disclaimer: I am not a real senator. I do have real moobs, though.
Jury nullification FTW!
November 6, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Jury nullification FTW!
Although Hamby pre-dates Obergefell, it was still based on the 14th amendment, so overruling Obergefell would overrule it as well.
November 5, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Although Hamby pre-dates Obergefell, it was still based on the 14th amendment, so overruling Obergefell would overrule it as well.
I wonder where the far right learned that they could mobilize their voters by stoking racial grievance from the premise that American society and institutions are structurally biased against them.
October 4, 2025 at 7:24 PM
I wonder where the far right learned that they could mobilize their voters by stoking racial grievance from the premise that American society and institutions are structurally biased against them.
“The Constitution” is not the same thing as “precedent set by previous courts”
September 28, 2025 at 8:27 PM
“The Constitution” is not the same thing as “precedent set by previous courts”
If driving 100 mph were in the course and scope of federal duties (imagine they were pursing a fleeing tax dodger), no, the state may not do anything about it.
September 22, 2025 at 11:05 PM
If driving 100 mph were in the course and scope of federal duties (imagine they were pursing a fleeing tax dodger), no, the state may not do anything about it.
Attiah materially altered the “verified quote” attributed to Kirk without indicating that she had done so or how.
September 17, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Attiah materially altered the “verified quote” attributed to Kirk without indicating that she had done so or how.
As I understand it, the response on the right is that law enforcement in jurisdictions run by Democrats are gaming crime statistics by under-charging or failing to charge obvious crimes.
September 6, 2025 at 5:40 PM
As I understand it, the response on the right is that law enforcement in jurisdictions run by Democrats are gaming crime statistics by under-charging or failing to charge obvious crimes.
Finally the court held evidence showing Klutchnikov had engaged in paper staking in the past was not inadmissible character evidence prohibited by Rule of Evidence 404(b). Although the plaintiff had not shown an overall “scheme,” evidence of past bad acts was admissible to show lack of accident.
August 16, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Finally the court held evidence showing Klutchnikov had engaged in paper staking in the past was not inadmissible character evidence prohibited by Rule of Evidence 404(b). Although the plaintiff had not shown an overall “scheme,” evidence of past bad acts was admissible to show lack of accident.
The court also held that the defendant could show undue prejudice based on harm to a third party, where the third party had a”grubstake” investment in the claim (money advanced to a prospector for a share in any findings).
August 16, 2025 at 1:10 AM
The court also held that the defendant could show undue prejudice based on harm to a third party, where the third party had a”grubstake” investment in the claim (money advanced to a prospector for a share in any findings).
The court first considered whether the defendant was entitled raise a defense of laches against a declaratory judgment claim, since laches applies only to equitable claims and not those at law. Since the claim was in substance a quiet title action (equitable), laches applied.
August 16, 2025 at 1:09 AM
The court first considered whether the defendant was entitled raise a defense of laches against a declaratory judgment claim, since laches applies only to equitable claims and not those at law. Since the claim was in substance a quiet title action (equitable), laches applied.
The alleged paper-staker (Klutchnikov) was “lost at sea,” but Baker pursued Klutchnikov’s successor in interest, Amerigold, to bench trial and won.
August 16, 2025 at 1:09 AM
The alleged paper-staker (Klutchnikov) was “lost at sea,” but Baker pursued Klutchnikov’s successor in interest, Amerigold, to bench trial and won.
the #Alaska #SupremeCourt considered an allegation of “paper staking” in a case involving conflicting mining claims. Paper staking occurs when someone recording a mining claim lies about having actually gone and physically marked the ground with “monuments.”
August 16, 2025 at 1:07 AM
the #Alaska #SupremeCourt considered an allegation of “paper staking” in a case involving conflicting mining claims. Paper staking occurs when someone recording a mining claim lies about having actually gone and physically marked the ground with “monuments.”
Easy. POTUS issues a blatantly unlawful executive order expropriating Alaska’s rights and when the action is challenged, SCOTUS refuses the case under original jurisdiction without explanation and then overturns the subsequent district court stay on the shadow docket, also w/o explanation.
August 14, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Easy. POTUS issues a blatantly unlawful executive order expropriating Alaska’s rights and when the action is challenged, SCOTUS refuses the case under original jurisdiction without explanation and then overturns the subsequent district court stay on the shadow docket, also w/o explanation.
Roe was criticized from day one even by liberal legal scholars for its remarkably poor legal reasoning. Obergefell is more robust in that it relies on equal protection as well as substantive due process. Not to say it’s safe, but it’s not in the same precarious position as Roe was pre-Dobbs.
August 12, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Roe was criticized from day one even by liberal legal scholars for its remarkably poor legal reasoning. Obergefell is more robust in that it relies on equal protection as well as substantive due process. Not to say it’s safe, but it’s not in the same precarious position as Roe was pre-Dobbs.
