Semra Sevi
@semrasevi.bsky.social
Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto
www.semrasevi.com
www.semrasevi.com
Quite a 24 hours in Canadian Politics, two Conservatives out (one to the Liberals, one gone altogether), a new Budget on the table, and my debut on Power & Politics! Nothing beats watching your research come to life.
Full interview here: gem.cbc.ca/power-politics
#cdnpoli
Full interview here: gem.cbc.ca/power-politics
#cdnpoli
November 8, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Quite a 24 hours in Canadian Politics, two Conservatives out (one to the Liberals, one gone altogether), a new Budget on the table, and my debut on Power & Politics! Nothing beats watching your research come to life.
Full interview here: gem.cbc.ca/power-politics
#cdnpoli
Full interview here: gem.cbc.ca/power-politics
#cdnpoli
🚨NEW PAPER: Do legislators trade favours?
My latest with Donald Green uses a natural lottery in the Canadian Parliament to test whether MPs return favours when others support their proposals.
Our findings may surprise you.👇
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
My latest with Donald Green uses a natural lottery in the Canadian Parliament to test whether MPs return favours when others support their proposals.
Our findings may surprise you.👇
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
July 11, 2025 at 1:49 PM
🚨NEW PAPER: Do legislators trade favours?
My latest with Donald Green uses a natural lottery in the Canadian Parliament to test whether MPs return favours when others support their proposals.
Our findings may surprise you.👇
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
My latest with Donald Green uses a natural lottery in the Canadian Parliament to test whether MPs return favours when others support their proposals.
Our findings may surprise you.👇
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
FINDING #2: Party matters more than person
Incumbency advantage:
Liberals pre-1972: +16 pts
Conservatives pre-1972: +8 pts (not significant)
Post-1972: Both parties? Advantage vanishes.
Incumbency advantage:
Liberals pre-1972: +16 pts
Conservatives pre-1972: +8 pts (not significant)
Post-1972: Both parties? Advantage vanishes.
June 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM
FINDING #2: Party matters more than person
Incumbency advantage:
Liberals pre-1972: +16 pts
Conservatives pre-1972: +8 pts (not significant)
Post-1972: Both parties? Advantage vanishes.
Incumbency advantage:
Liberals pre-1972: +16 pts
Conservatives pre-1972: +8 pts (not significant)
Post-1972: Both parties? Advantage vanishes.
Using data from 1867 to 2021, and a RDD, I estimate the causal impact of incumbency on electoral success.
FINDING #1: The incumbency advantage shrank dramatically.
✅ Before 1972: Incumbents had a 15-point edge.
❌ After 1972: Just 2 points, and no longer significant.
FINDING #1: The incumbency advantage shrank dramatically.
✅ Before 1972: Incumbents had a 15-point edge.
❌ After 1972: Just 2 points, and no longer significant.
June 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Using data from 1867 to 2021, and a RDD, I estimate the causal impact of incumbency on electoral success.
FINDING #1: The incumbency advantage shrank dramatically.
✅ Before 1972: Incumbents had a 15-point edge.
❌ After 1972: Just 2 points, and no longer significant.
FINDING #1: The incumbency advantage shrank dramatically.
✅ Before 1972: Incumbents had a 15-point edge.
❌ After 1972: Just 2 points, and no longer significant.
🚨NEW PAPER: Do incumbents really have an edge in elections?
Research says yes. But what happens when party labels are added to the ballot?
A natural experiment from Canadian elections tells an interesting story👇🧵
Research says yes. But what happens when party labels are added to the ballot?
A natural experiment from Canadian elections tells an interesting story👇🧵
June 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM
🚨NEW PAPER: Do incumbents really have an edge in elections?
Research says yes. But what happens when party labels are added to the ballot?
A natural experiment from Canadian elections tells an interesting story👇🧵
Research says yes. But what happens when party labels are added to the ballot?
A natural experiment from Canadian elections tells an interesting story👇🧵
🚨 NEW PAPER 🚨 with Charles Crabtree & André Blais "Do Voters Punish Women Politicians More?"
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
August 24, 2024 at 1:57 PM
🚨 NEW PAPER 🚨 with Charles Crabtree & André Blais "Do Voters Punish Women Politicians More?"
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
🚨Are feminine traits a liability in elections? My latest with André Blais at Acta Politica is now online!
April 17, 2024 at 9:43 PM
🚨Are feminine traits a liability in elections? My latest with André Blais at Acta Politica is now online!
Ever wonder whether snap elections backfire? In my latest with Marco M. Aviña & @rdassonneville.bsky.social we study this question in the Canadian context. Now out at the Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
December 13, 2023 at 6:23 PM
Ever wonder whether snap elections backfire? In my latest with Marco M. Aviña & @rdassonneville.bsky.social we study this question in the Canadian context. Now out at the Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Really excited to share my latest with André Blais now out at Electoral Studies on "Are women election averse?"
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@uoft.bsky.social
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@uoft.bsky.social
November 9, 2023 at 5:19 PM
Really excited to share my latest with André Blais now out at Electoral Studies on "Are women election averse?"
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@uoft.bsky.social
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@uoft.bsky.social